YouTube: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xpo8SdY1JSw
Previous: The Door to Hell
Next: Buddha's Birthplace, Poop Transplants & 'Cryptic Cats'

Categories

Statistics

View count:1,941,851
Likes:36,753
Comments:6,165
Duration:03:51
Uploaded:2013-11-28
Last sync:2024-10-31 18:45

Citation

Citation formatting is not guaranteed to be accurate.
MLA Full: "This is NOT What Evolution Looks Like." YouTube, uploaded by SciShow, 28 November 2013, www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpo8SdY1JSw.
MLA Inline: (SciShow, 2013)
APA Full: SciShow. (2013, November 28). This is NOT What Evolution Looks Like [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=xpo8SdY1JSw
APA Inline: (SciShow, 2013)
Chicago Full: SciShow, "This is NOT What Evolution Looks Like.", November 28, 2013, YouTube, 03:51,
https://youtube.com/watch?v=xpo8SdY1JSw.
Hank explains where that over-simplified image of evolution comes from and what it is actually supposed to mean.

Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: http://dftba.com/artist/52/SciShow

Or help support us by subscribing to our page on Subbable: https://subbable.com/scishow
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com

Thanks Tank Tumblr: http://thankstank.tumblr.com

SOURCES:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_of_Progress
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evograms_07
http://mentalfloss.com/article/19428/neanderthal-vs-cro-magnon-whats-difference
http://www.sci-news.com/paleontology/science-oreopithecus-01261.html
Hank Green: Along with the double helix and the famous blue marble photo of the earth taken from space, it's probably one of the most recognizable scientific images in the world:  A depiction of human evolution in just six easy steps. But of course, as professional wrestling and pretty much all of reality television has shown us, just because something is popular doesn't mean it's an accurate depiction of reality.

(SciShow Intro plays)

Let me walk you through it.  You probably recognize the naked guy on the right, that's Homo sapiens, an anatomically modern human.  The guy who seems to be stalking him is labelled Cro-magnon, a rough looking customer who I'll talk about more in a minute.  Behind him is Neanderthal, on his heels are Ramapithecus, then Oreopithecus which sounds delicious, and finally a tiny, monkey-like early ape known as Dryopithecus.  

The idea of this evolving from this may seem like it's right out of the 19th century but these images actually first appeared in 1965 in a volume published by Time Life Books called "Early Man".  And in its defense, the book wasn't exactly trying to say that we evolved right from that hairy little homoniculus, instead, the book, written by anthropologist F. Clark Howell offered a relatively nuanced discussion of human evolution for the time, and even warned against interpreting the illustration literally as a progression from one species directly to the next.  But the book sold well and the illustration became extremely popular, and even though the picture originally included 15 different primates in a row and was called The Road to Homo Sapiens, the abbreviated version of it became known as the March of Progress, and thus one of science's most pernicious memes was born.  

So, what's wrong with this picture?  Well, first of all, there are only males in this picture.  Humans, like most animals, reproduce sexually, which means we come in two distinct flavors and they make our existence possible.  Teaching the history of our development with only one sex is like trying to eat sushi with only one chopstick, you're just not gonna get it all.  

Next, we're not even directly related to some of those guys, like as Howell himself pointed it out, Oreopithecus was kind of a bit player in the human drama, he lived for a few million years in what's now Southern Europe, but disappeared rather quickly.  And the latest research suggests that it probably wasn't even bipedal as you see here.  

Then there's Cro-Magnon, while that was kind of a catchall phrase for primitive humans 50 years ago, the specimen that the term was based on turned out to be a modern Homo sapiens, so they're generally no longer considered to even be a thing.  

We also did not evolve from Neanderthals as the picture suggests.  Modern humans and Neanderthals actually co-existed until about 40,000 years ago.  We were contemporaries with a shared common ancestor.  But they turned out to be unable to adapt to all of the changes in the world around them, including the arrival of us.

And that's by far the most important problem with this image: Evolution isn't a linear process, it doesn't turn one species into another into another, it's really about genetics.  Organisms are constantly developing new adaptations, and the ones with the adaptations that make them most fit for their environment  end up reproducing more and spreading their genes all over the place.  Scientists call that being evolutionarily successful, and there are plenty of other organisms with whom we share ancestors that are just as successful, like chimps and orangutans, because they continue to exist and evolve like we do.  

If you had to express it visually, the human story would probably look more like an incredibly complex tree, or maybe more of a fractal with many stubs and branches, some of which extend to the present time while others taper out.  But it definitely would not resemble some kind of primate police line-up.

Thank you for watching this episode of SciShow, and a special thanks to our Subbable subscribers, without whom this show would not be possible.  If you have any questions or comments or ideas for us, you can find us on Facebook and Twitter and down in the comments below, and if you want to keep getting smarter with us here at SciShow, you can go to YouTube.com/SciShow and subscribe.

(SciShow Endscreen plays)