scishow
How Many Suns Can One Planet Have?
YouTube: | https://youtube.com/watch?v=r3lfXL5cJgM |
Previous: | Why you're sick of rainy days #science #SciShow #sick #biology #illness #rain |
Next: | Hacking the Brain to Treat Tinnitus |
Categories
Statistics
View count: | 218,605 |
Likes: | 10,508 |
Comments: | 403 |
Duration: | 10:26 |
Uploaded: | 2023-10-09 |
Last sync: | 2024-11-26 20:15 |
Citation
Citation formatting is not guaranteed to be accurate. | |
MLA Full: | "How Many Suns Can One Planet Have?" YouTube, uploaded by SciShow, 9 October 2023, www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3lfXL5cJgM. |
MLA Inline: | (SciShow, 2023) |
APA Full: | SciShow. (2023, October 9). How Many Suns Can One Planet Have? [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=r3lfXL5cJgM |
APA Inline: | (SciShow, 2023) |
Chicago Full: |
SciShow, "How Many Suns Can One Planet Have?", October 9, 2023, YouTube, 10:26, https://youtube.com/watch?v=r3lfXL5cJgM. |
Visit https://brilliant.org/scishow/ to get started learning STEM for free. The first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription and a 30-day free trial.
Earth and the other seven planets in our solar system have only one star: the Sun. Years ago, astronomers found the first exoplanet that had two stars. They also found one with three stars. And four. Just how many stars can one planet have?
Hosted by: Savannah Geary
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever: Adam Brainard, Alex Hackman, Ash, Bryan Cloer, charles george, Chris Mackey, Chris Peters, Christoph Schwanke, Christopher R Boucher, Eric Jensen, Harrison Mills, Jaap Westera, Jason A Saslow, Jeffrey Mckishen, Jeremy Mattern, Kevin Bealer, Matt Curls, Michelle Dove, Piya Shedden, Rizwan Kassim, Sam Lutfi
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
SciShow Tangents Podcast: https://scishow-tangents.simplecast.com/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
#SciShow #science #education #learning #complexly
----------
Sources:
Sources:
ttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-01948-4
https://universe.nasa.gov/stars/multiple-star-systems/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.06851.pdf
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/planet-reared-by-four-parent-stars
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/127
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1504.07065.pdf
https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/news/1672/discovery-alert-first-six-star-system-where-all-six-stars-undergo-eclipses/
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/abddb5/pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327730665_Stability_of_planets_in_triple_star_systems/download
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/images/alpha-centauri-a-triple-star-system-about-4-light-years-from-earth.html
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature19106#Sec2
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-021-03959-x
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/166
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/483/3/3465/5237726
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2005/16/aa0238-04.pdf
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/ab64fa/pdf
https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.2000
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.09776.pdf
https://phys.org/news/2023-05-astrophysicists-planet-hosting-three-star.html
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4365/ac9302
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10794
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10794.pdf
https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.03449
https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05188
Images:
https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1624c/
https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/images/2016/31/3762-Image.html?news=true
https://www.gettyimages.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTMKsQ63Bl8&ab_channel=NASAVideo
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-01948-4
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Artist_concept_of_JWST_(50489833002_107cb9e661_o).jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:An_artist%E2%80%99s_impression_of_planet_in_the_HD_131399_system.tif
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HD188753_orbit.jpg
https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso2014c/
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alpha,_Beta_and_Proxima_Centauri_(1).jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:A_fly-through_of_the_Alpha_Centauri_system.ogv
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Alpha_Centauri_relative_sizes.svg
https://www.eso.org/public/blog/a-long-time-ago/
https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/four-suns-of-hd-98800/
https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/resources/1032/kepler-launch-and-deployment-complete/
https://science.nasa.gov/resource/transit-light-curve/
https://universe.nasa.gov/resources/149/binary-system/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Infographic_depicting_the_sextuple_star_system_Castor,_and_details_about_its_components.jpg
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/background-of-galaxy-and-stars-royalty-free-image/1035676256?phrase=stars+space&adppopup=true
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:KeplerSpaceTelescope_-Retirement-ArtistConcept-20181030.jpg
https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/news/1672/discovery-alert-first-six-star-system-where-all-six-stars-undergo-eclipses/
https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/news/1362/a-surprising-planet-with-three-suns/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Full_Sunburst_over_Earth.JPG
https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/illustration-of-an-earth-sized-tatooine-planet/
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-kepler-discovery-confirms-first-planet-orbiting-two-stars
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circumbinary_Star_System_illustration.jpg
https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/032/01G72W1XZK6A79RJK2Z93D58CD
https://www.eso.org/public/videos/eso1311b/
Earth and the other seven planets in our solar system have only one star: the Sun. Years ago, astronomers found the first exoplanet that had two stars. They also found one with three stars. And four. Just how many stars can one planet have?
Hosted by: Savannah Geary
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever: Adam Brainard, Alex Hackman, Ash, Bryan Cloer, charles george, Chris Mackey, Chris Peters, Christoph Schwanke, Christopher R Boucher, Eric Jensen, Harrison Mills, Jaap Westera, Jason A Saslow, Jeffrey Mckishen, Jeremy Mattern, Kevin Bealer, Matt Curls, Michelle Dove, Piya Shedden, Rizwan Kassim, Sam Lutfi
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
SciShow Tangents Podcast: https://scishow-tangents.simplecast.com/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
#SciShow #science #education #learning #complexly
----------
Sources:
Sources:
ttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-01948-4
https://universe.nasa.gov/stars/multiple-star-systems/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.06851.pdf
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/planet-reared-by-four-parent-stars
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/127
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1504.07065.pdf
https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/news/1672/discovery-alert-first-six-star-system-where-all-six-stars-undergo-eclipses/
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/abddb5/pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327730665_Stability_of_planets_in_triple_star_systems/download
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/images/alpha-centauri-a-triple-star-system-about-4-light-years-from-earth.html
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature19106#Sec2
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-021-03959-x
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/166
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/483/3/3465/5237726
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2005/16/aa0238-04.pdf
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/ab64fa/pdf
https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.2000
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.09776.pdf
https://phys.org/news/2023-05-astrophysicists-planet-hosting-three-star.html
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4365/ac9302
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10794
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10794.pdf
https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.03449
https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05188
Images:
https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1624c/
https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/images/2016/31/3762-Image.html?news=true
https://www.gettyimages.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTMKsQ63Bl8&ab_channel=NASAVideo
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-01948-4
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Artist_concept_of_JWST_(50489833002_107cb9e661_o).jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:An_artist%E2%80%99s_impression_of_planet_in_the_HD_131399_system.tif
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HD188753_orbit.jpg
https://www.eso.org/public/images/eso2014c/
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alpha,_Beta_and_Proxima_Centauri_(1).jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:A_fly-through_of_the_Alpha_Centauri_system.ogv
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Alpha_Centauri_relative_sizes.svg
https://www.eso.org/public/blog/a-long-time-ago/
https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/four-suns-of-hd-98800/
https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/resources/1032/kepler-launch-and-deployment-complete/
https://science.nasa.gov/resource/transit-light-curve/
https://universe.nasa.gov/resources/149/binary-system/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Infographic_depicting_the_sextuple_star_system_Castor,_and_details_about_its_components.jpg
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/background-of-galaxy-and-stars-royalty-free-image/1035676256?phrase=stars+space&adppopup=true
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:KeplerSpaceTelescope_-Retirement-ArtistConcept-20181030.jpg
https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/news/1672/discovery-alert-first-six-star-system-where-all-six-stars-undergo-eclipses/
https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/news/1362/a-surprising-planet-with-three-suns/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Full_Sunburst_over_Earth.JPG
https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/illustration-of-an-earth-sized-tatooine-planet/
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-kepler-discovery-confirms-first-planet-orbiting-two-stars
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circumbinary_Star_System_illustration.jpg
https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/032/01G72W1XZK6A79RJK2Z93D58CD
https://www.eso.org/public/videos/eso1311b/
Thanks to Brilliant for supporting this SciShow List Show!
As a SciShow viewer, you can keep building your STEM skills with a 30 day free trial and 20% off an annual premium subscription at Brilliant.org/SciShow. It might not seem like it, but our solar system is … weird!
For one thing, unlike our solo Sun, most stars out there have at least one partner. Imagine what the sky would look like if we threw another sun into the mix. What the orbits of all the planets would have to be to make it all work out.
Now imagine if Earth had three suns. Or four! Some planetary systems actually work like that.
And to make it happen, the orbits can get a little brain-bendy. Especially for any planets, which being a lot less massive, are a lot more beholden to their stars’ movement. So in this SciShow list show, we’re exploring some of those wacky multi-star systems, how planets can exist inside of them, and how we even know about them in the first place. [Intro] Now organizationally speaking, our one-star system is not too far off from some two-star systems.
In that setup, a planet like Earth still orbits around a single point. Only now, that point isn’t where one star exists, but rather where two stars… orbit each other. Those two stars form what’s known as a binary.
And they’re just swinging around each other like two besties holding hands and spinning in circles in a field of daisies… if those besties also had really stretchy arms so they weren’t always the same distance apart. A planet can circle around that binary in what’s called a circumbinary orbit. That’s how the BEBOP-1 system works.
Thanks to two separate discoveries, using three separate telescopes, astronomers know that BEBOP-1 has two gas giant planets that both orbit two stars in roughly circular orbits. That’s a lot of bodies swinging around each other. But gravity allows it because proportionally, the stars are much closer to each other than either of them is to a planet.
While the stars orbit each other once every 14.6 days, the inner planet orbits the binary once every 95.2 days. So if you were in a levitating city on one of those gassy planets, it would look like Star Wars’s Tatooine! There would be two suns in your sky that stay relatively close to each other.
Aside from adding credibility to Star Wars’s stunning sunsets, BEBOP-1 is an exciting system for researchers because it’s bright enough to be a new target for the Webb telescope. It could teach us about the atmospheres of circumbinary planets and, as the researchers say, “provide a new hope” to unravel their mysteries. Amazingly, that was not our pun; that was the researcher's pun.
So that’s an example of a two-star system. And adding just one more star …going from a binary to a trinary… can’t change too much, right? Well, it turns out that that third star makes things so much more complicated.
Now one of them could get kicked out, or the entire system could fall apart. And that’s not even getting to the planet issue. Sure, maybe physics would allow a trinary version of the BEBOP-1 system, with a planet or two orbiting super far away from the complicated dance three stars have to do with one another.
But there are cooler arrangements that exist, too. For example, instead of orbiting all three stars at once, it’s mathematically possible for a planet to orbit just one of the stars, which is then in its own long distance relationship with a binary. And guess what?
The trinary next door actually has this arrangement! Collectively, the three stars that make up the Alpha Centauri system are about 40 trillion kilometers from our Sun. Which is simultaneously super far away, and still three times closer than any other Sun-like star out there.
The two central stars, known as Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B are very similar to ours in terms of appearance. But the planets we’ve found are orbiting the third star in the trinary, a red dwarf called Proxima Centauri. Which is only about 14% the size of our sun and 0.15% as luminous.
So it’s a little guy, but it’s got enough going for it to have at least two planets… one a little more massive than Earth, and the other one that’s closer in mass to Mars. If you were standing on either of these planets, a daytime sky would be a little more red and a little less bright than you’re used to. Because even though you're in orbit of such a dim star, you’re way closer than the Earth is to the Sun.
And unfortunately, Alpha Centauri A and B are so far away they’d just be two distant white dots among a sea of stars. Which is a bit disappointing from a space tourist’s perspective, but sometimes you’ve gotta make sacrifices to fit three whole stars into one planetary system. Now there are plenty of binary and trinary systems out there, but systems with four stars are harder to find.
So you might think that only the most experienced researchers with dozens of publications under their belt could identify a planet in one. But the first four-star planetary system was discovered by a group of amateurs. Like, Now before 2012, researchers knew that there was a stellar binary in the system with the melodious catalog name KIC 4862625.
But that system was about to get totally reclassified thanks to citizen scientists who may not have had any background in physics or space science. They were volunteers who spent their free time looking through data collected by NASA’s Kepler and TESS missions, just because it’s cool. It’s a project called “Planet Hunters”, where anyone can sign up to comb through this public data in the hopes of finding new exoplanets.
And in this case those hopes turned into results. Each volunteer is randomly assigned a small section of the missions’ datasets from over 300,000 stars. And their job is to draw a box wherever they see evidence of a little dip in a star’s brightness.
Because sometimes, what they’re seeing in that dip is a planet passing in front of its star, blocking some of the light from reaching us. And sure, you could do some of this work with a computer program. But if there’s more than one star in close proximity, like when there’s a binary, the planet’s signal can be hidden among the dips caused by the two stars blocking some of each other’s light.
And where algorithms might fail to spot that detail, human eyes can catch something worth following up on. Spoiler alert, that’s what citizen science did for KIC 48 et cetera …all those numbers But once this particular system caught their eyes, these amateur astronomers looked deeper and found a second binary of stars had been there all along. This was a four-star system, making it the first four-star system with a planet in it as far as NASA knows.
So there’s a binary of stars circling each other, with a planet orbiting both of them, and another stellar binary going around all of that. If you were looking at the sky from this quadruple star planet, you’d probably see two Suns and one very bright star which is actually two stars smushed right up together. It’s like how from Earth, you can look up at the Big Dipper and totally miss that some of the stars are actually multi-star systems.
So hats off to citizen scientists for showing us cool systems like this one! And yes, astrophysicists had to then officially confirmed the findings. But this huge discovery could have been made by you, or your neighbor, or the person operating the camera for this SciShow video!
And since that discovery, researchers have started to realize that four-star systems are more common than they used to think. Could there be planets in 5+ star systems? But a planet in a five-or-more-star system?
That’s still hypothetical …at least as of filming. Astronomers have found systems with five, six, and maybe even seven stars. And odds are there are more out there.
So we know that stars can group together in these big batches. But at this point in time, we haven’t found any evidence that a planet can coexist with all of that. I mean, it’s hard enough to find all of the stars in a crowded system.
For example, in the five-star system whose name I’m not even going to try to say out loud, researchers were totally missing the fifth star for over a year. They originally reported two binaries in a double eclipsing four-star system. The dimmer binary was identified first, because they thought the brighter one was just a twinkle glinting off one of the other stars.
But something about this system made them want to look deeper. Even after they thought they’d determined that it was a four-star system, they kept an eye on it because the two stars in one of the binary pairs orbited each other faster than in any known four-star system. So when another research team claimed to find a fifth star traveling at the same velocity as the rest of them, the original team agreed that it’s probably a package deal.
Maybe one day astronomers will find out there’s a planet in that package too. Or maybe they won’t. But while we’re shooting for the stars, why not talk about six-star systems that could theoretically be home to planets too?
One six-star system we’ve recently discovered is called TYC 7037-89-1. It’s made up of three binaries that are all similar in mass, size, and temperature. Two binaries orbit each other.
Then, those four do a big dance with the third binary. Now, each of the binaries has a pretty short orbital period of only a matter of days. They’re all tight pairs.
But the orbits of the binaries around each other are much larger, giving them room to spin around each other as they move. They’re also far enough away that each binary can act like just one source of gravity, making the physics a lot less messy. Ultimately, there might be other kinds of six-star systems out there, like two sets of triplets.
But because the third star in each triple would have to orbit so much farther away, we’re more likely to find six-star systems like
TYC: a triplet of binaries. Since these larger, more complicated systems are harder to find and stick together in the first place, it might not be too surprising that we haven’t found any planets in them so far. But in space, sometimes you just have to keep looking. Maybe a few years of searching will lead to new discoveries.
And we’re going to make them all from our solar system with just the one star. Which works perfectly well for us. One thing that all of these solar systems have in common is that their stars are brilliant, just like this video’s sponsor!
This SciShow List Show is supported by Brilliant: an online learning platform with thousands of interactive lessons in science, computer science, and math. Like their course on Vector Calculus! This course gets into some concepts that any planet hunters out there would find really valuable, including calculating planetary orbits.
So you’ll come for the calculus of motion and stay for electrostatics. To try it free for 30 days, you can visit Brilliant.org/SciShow or click the link in the description down below. That link also gives you 20% off an annual premium Brilliant subscription.
Thanks for watching! [ OUTRO ]
As a SciShow viewer, you can keep building your STEM skills with a 30 day free trial and 20% off an annual premium subscription at Brilliant.org/SciShow. It might not seem like it, but our solar system is … weird!
For one thing, unlike our solo Sun, most stars out there have at least one partner. Imagine what the sky would look like if we threw another sun into the mix. What the orbits of all the planets would have to be to make it all work out.
Now imagine if Earth had three suns. Or four! Some planetary systems actually work like that.
And to make it happen, the orbits can get a little brain-bendy. Especially for any planets, which being a lot less massive, are a lot more beholden to their stars’ movement. So in this SciShow list show, we’re exploring some of those wacky multi-star systems, how planets can exist inside of them, and how we even know about them in the first place. [Intro] Now organizationally speaking, our one-star system is not too far off from some two-star systems.
In that setup, a planet like Earth still orbits around a single point. Only now, that point isn’t where one star exists, but rather where two stars… orbit each other. Those two stars form what’s known as a binary.
And they’re just swinging around each other like two besties holding hands and spinning in circles in a field of daisies… if those besties also had really stretchy arms so they weren’t always the same distance apart. A planet can circle around that binary in what’s called a circumbinary orbit. That’s how the BEBOP-1 system works.
Thanks to two separate discoveries, using three separate telescopes, astronomers know that BEBOP-1 has two gas giant planets that both orbit two stars in roughly circular orbits. That’s a lot of bodies swinging around each other. But gravity allows it because proportionally, the stars are much closer to each other than either of them is to a planet.
While the stars orbit each other once every 14.6 days, the inner planet orbits the binary once every 95.2 days. So if you were in a levitating city on one of those gassy planets, it would look like Star Wars’s Tatooine! There would be two suns in your sky that stay relatively close to each other.
Aside from adding credibility to Star Wars’s stunning sunsets, BEBOP-1 is an exciting system for researchers because it’s bright enough to be a new target for the Webb telescope. It could teach us about the atmospheres of circumbinary planets and, as the researchers say, “provide a new hope” to unravel their mysteries. Amazingly, that was not our pun; that was the researcher's pun.
So that’s an example of a two-star system. And adding just one more star …going from a binary to a trinary… can’t change too much, right? Well, it turns out that that third star makes things so much more complicated.
Now one of them could get kicked out, or the entire system could fall apart. And that’s not even getting to the planet issue. Sure, maybe physics would allow a trinary version of the BEBOP-1 system, with a planet or two orbiting super far away from the complicated dance three stars have to do with one another.
But there are cooler arrangements that exist, too. For example, instead of orbiting all three stars at once, it’s mathematically possible for a planet to orbit just one of the stars, which is then in its own long distance relationship with a binary. And guess what?
The trinary next door actually has this arrangement! Collectively, the three stars that make up the Alpha Centauri system are about 40 trillion kilometers from our Sun. Which is simultaneously super far away, and still three times closer than any other Sun-like star out there.
The two central stars, known as Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B are very similar to ours in terms of appearance. But the planets we’ve found are orbiting the third star in the trinary, a red dwarf called Proxima Centauri. Which is only about 14% the size of our sun and 0.15% as luminous.
So it’s a little guy, but it’s got enough going for it to have at least two planets… one a little more massive than Earth, and the other one that’s closer in mass to Mars. If you were standing on either of these planets, a daytime sky would be a little more red and a little less bright than you’re used to. Because even though you're in orbit of such a dim star, you’re way closer than the Earth is to the Sun.
And unfortunately, Alpha Centauri A and B are so far away they’d just be two distant white dots among a sea of stars. Which is a bit disappointing from a space tourist’s perspective, but sometimes you’ve gotta make sacrifices to fit three whole stars into one planetary system. Now there are plenty of binary and trinary systems out there, but systems with four stars are harder to find.
So you might think that only the most experienced researchers with dozens of publications under their belt could identify a planet in one. But the first four-star planetary system was discovered by a group of amateurs. Like, Now before 2012, researchers knew that there was a stellar binary in the system with the melodious catalog name KIC 4862625.
But that system was about to get totally reclassified thanks to citizen scientists who may not have had any background in physics or space science. They were volunteers who spent their free time looking through data collected by NASA’s Kepler and TESS missions, just because it’s cool. It’s a project called “Planet Hunters”, where anyone can sign up to comb through this public data in the hopes of finding new exoplanets.
And in this case those hopes turned into results. Each volunteer is randomly assigned a small section of the missions’ datasets from over 300,000 stars. And their job is to draw a box wherever they see evidence of a little dip in a star’s brightness.
Because sometimes, what they’re seeing in that dip is a planet passing in front of its star, blocking some of the light from reaching us. And sure, you could do some of this work with a computer program. But if there’s more than one star in close proximity, like when there’s a binary, the planet’s signal can be hidden among the dips caused by the two stars blocking some of each other’s light.
And where algorithms might fail to spot that detail, human eyes can catch something worth following up on. Spoiler alert, that’s what citizen science did for KIC 48 et cetera …all those numbers But once this particular system caught their eyes, these amateur astronomers looked deeper and found a second binary of stars had been there all along. This was a four-star system, making it the first four-star system with a planet in it as far as NASA knows.
So there’s a binary of stars circling each other, with a planet orbiting both of them, and another stellar binary going around all of that. If you were looking at the sky from this quadruple star planet, you’d probably see two Suns and one very bright star which is actually two stars smushed right up together. It’s like how from Earth, you can look up at the Big Dipper and totally miss that some of the stars are actually multi-star systems.
So hats off to citizen scientists for showing us cool systems like this one! And yes, astrophysicists had to then officially confirmed the findings. But this huge discovery could have been made by you, or your neighbor, or the person operating the camera for this SciShow video!
And since that discovery, researchers have started to realize that four-star systems are more common than they used to think. Could there be planets in 5+ star systems? But a planet in a five-or-more-star system?
That’s still hypothetical …at least as of filming. Astronomers have found systems with five, six, and maybe even seven stars. And odds are there are more out there.
So we know that stars can group together in these big batches. But at this point in time, we haven’t found any evidence that a planet can coexist with all of that. I mean, it’s hard enough to find all of the stars in a crowded system.
For example, in the five-star system whose name I’m not even going to try to say out loud, researchers were totally missing the fifth star for over a year. They originally reported two binaries in a double eclipsing four-star system. The dimmer binary was identified first, because they thought the brighter one was just a twinkle glinting off one of the other stars.
But something about this system made them want to look deeper. Even after they thought they’d determined that it was a four-star system, they kept an eye on it because the two stars in one of the binary pairs orbited each other faster than in any known four-star system. So when another research team claimed to find a fifth star traveling at the same velocity as the rest of them, the original team agreed that it’s probably a package deal.
Maybe one day astronomers will find out there’s a planet in that package too. Or maybe they won’t. But while we’re shooting for the stars, why not talk about six-star systems that could theoretically be home to planets too?
One six-star system we’ve recently discovered is called TYC 7037-89-1. It’s made up of three binaries that are all similar in mass, size, and temperature. Two binaries orbit each other.
Then, those four do a big dance with the third binary. Now, each of the binaries has a pretty short orbital period of only a matter of days. They’re all tight pairs.
But the orbits of the binaries around each other are much larger, giving them room to spin around each other as they move. They’re also far enough away that each binary can act like just one source of gravity, making the physics a lot less messy. Ultimately, there might be other kinds of six-star systems out there, like two sets of triplets.
But because the third star in each triple would have to orbit so much farther away, we’re more likely to find six-star systems like
TYC: a triplet of binaries. Since these larger, more complicated systems are harder to find and stick together in the first place, it might not be too surprising that we haven’t found any planets in them so far. But in space, sometimes you just have to keep looking. Maybe a few years of searching will lead to new discoveries.
And we’re going to make them all from our solar system with just the one star. Which works perfectly well for us. One thing that all of these solar systems have in common is that their stars are brilliant, just like this video’s sponsor!
This SciShow List Show is supported by Brilliant: an online learning platform with thousands of interactive lessons in science, computer science, and math. Like their course on Vector Calculus! This course gets into some concepts that any planet hunters out there would find really valuable, including calculating planetary orbits.
So you’ll come for the calculus of motion and stay for electrostatics. To try it free for 30 days, you can visit Brilliant.org/SciShow or click the link in the description down below. That link also gives you 20% off an annual premium Brilliant subscription.
Thanks for watching! [ OUTRO ]