YouTube: https://youtube.com/watch?v=onxeBOnjWnU
Previous: Is Psychology a Science?
Next: Can You Really Multitask?

Categories

Statistics

View count:157,722
Likes:7,374
Dislikes:99
Comments:707
Duration:05:00
Uploaded:2017-03-09
Last sync:2019-06-14 03:00
Internet fandoms can get... sort of intense, but is an unwavering devotion to your Hogwarts house an unhealthy fixation or a way to reach out to others and engage in the world around you?

Hosted by: Brit Garner
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters—we couldn't make SciShow without them! Shout out to Kevin Bealer, Mark Terrio-Cameron, KatieMarie Magnone, Patrick Merrithew, Charles Southerland, Fatima Iqbal, Benny, Kyle Anderson, Tim Curwick, Scott Satovsky Jr, Will and Sonja Marple, Philippe von Bergen, Bella Nash, Bryce Daifuku, Chris Peters, Patrick D. Ashmore, Charles George, Bader AlGhamdi
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
----------
Sources:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0124312
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6156/377
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/103/1/1/
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0140838
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18803066
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23925307
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681311000061
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=505248.505275
https://hbr.org/1996/05/the-real-value-of-on-line-communities
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651513/
http://fansconf.a-kon.com/dRuZ33A/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Fan-Motivation.pdf

Image Sources:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&profile=images&search=furries&fulltext=1&searchToken=4ngo30kl2nzeeuwvgitsafcz#/media/File:Furries_at_Folsom_Street_Fair_%2706.jpg
Brit: Here at SciShow Psychology, we love the Internet. While it might have its dark sides, it’s also home to tons of information, cat videos, and massive communities of people who share common interests.

Anyone can go online and engage with Trekkies, draw fanart with Directioners, or decrease worldsuck with Nerdfighters – and geek out to your heart’s content. But what gets us so invested in the ships and the fanfics? And do people in different fandoms have different psychological experiences?

I’m Brit Garner, and this is SciShow Psych.

[Intro]

Fans – short for fanatics – can range from occasional TV show watchers, to football season ticket holders who show up to games in full facepaint.

When social psychologists talk about fans, they're usually talking about people who are active participants in the culture and community surrounding their subject of interest. We become fans for a lot of different reasons. But one big part of fandom is feeling a strong connection with your favorite characters, celebrities, and athletes – their struggles feel personal.

Some psychologists have been trying to understand why it feels so personal by studying how people respond to literature. There’s some evidence that when reading fiction, we “lose ourselves” in the character’s experience – a phenomenon called experience-taking. In 2012, one small study had a group of college students read stories and share their thoughts about themselves, and the characters in the story.

Students who generally weren’t as focused on their own internal thoughts and experiences seemed to more easily step into the main character’s shoes, especially if it was a first person narrative. This is related to something called theory of mind: the fact that you can recognize that you and I are two different people with our own motivations and goals.

There are two main parts to this idea: there’s cognitive theory of mind, which is understanding someone else’s intentions and knowledge, and affective theory of mind, which is understanding someone's emotional state (basically, empathy).

In a 2013 study with a couple hundred participants, scientists found that subjects who read literary fiction with complex characters – as opposed to pop fiction, with predictable characters, nonfiction, or nothing – scored higher in measures of affective theory of mind.

How does this relate to fandom? Like I said, it makes things personal. When you’re reading about Harry, Ron and Hermione, you can step into their shoes, and empathize with their fears, triumphs, and friendship. The Wizarding World isn’t real, but it feels real – and that’s important.

A study from 2015 involving a little over 2000 participants found a bunch of different motivations for engaging in so-called geek culture. They found that people who are looking for a self-esteem boost, or who are narcissistic, seem to engage in geek culture to play out fantasies that aren’t possible in real life – after all, you can’t go smashing orcs around town, but you can in D&D.

But these participants don’t just isolate themselves in fantasy worlds, they seem to contribute to the real world in some ways, too. The study found that many fans participate in civic activism, like self-help and nationality-related groups, although they seem to be less involved in political activism.

Their research also supported what they called the Belongingness Hypothesis. That’s the idea that people use common media – like Star Wars – to build communities and increase their sense of belonging.

Another study surveying fantasy sports fans, anime fans, and furries, found a similar trend, and found that people in different fandoms might have slightly different reasons for being fans. Their research found that people who were anime fans or furries were more likely to participate in their fandoms because it created a sense of belonging, which was less common in fantasy sports fans.

The anime and furry communities tend to be ridiculed by society in ways that fantasy sports aren’t, so the researchers concluded that fandoms can be a place where uncommon interests can be celebrated and shared.

So fandoms can be great! They’re a space where you can be enthusiastic with a whole community of like-minded people. But too much of any good thing can turn sour. If you become too attached to the characters or community of a fandom, it can become harder for you to feel empathy for other groups, like other fandoms, or non-fans.

There’s a lot of psychological evidence that we feel more empathy for people who are in our communities than for people who are from different communities. And when it comes to competitive fandoms, like sports, there can be negative effects when things don’t go our way. Like, one 2013 study even found that football fans are more likely to make unhealthy food choices the day after their team lost a game.

Depending on the nature of your fanaticism, psychologists have found that being a sports fan can be good for life satisfaction and self-esteem – called a harmonious passion. Or it can make you kind of miserable by fostering frustration or hatred of non-fans – called an obsessive passion. So it’s important to be able to step back and see your fandom as part of a larger whole, and not let these communities become your entire world.

Strong social networks and relationships are good for your health and mental well-being, and hobbies and interests are important, as long as they don’t veer into unhealthy obsession. So keep on cosplaying as Harley Quinn, reblogging those Sherlock puns, and commenting on obscure YouTube videos – embrace your nerdiness!

Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow Psychology, and especially to our patrons on Patreon! If you’d like to keep help us making episodes like this one, just go to patreon.com/scishow. And for lots of new psychology content every week, go to youtube.com/scishowpsych and subscribe!