scishow
Why Protons Are Still Such a Mystery to Scientists
YouTube: | https://youtube.com/watch?v=nFoDOSzBM2I |
Previous: | Bite Sized Food Facts! | Compilation |
Next: | If the Asteroid Hit 10 Minutes Later... |
Categories
Statistics
View count: | 432,557 |
Likes: | 21,216 |
Comments: | 947 |
Duration: | 06:16 |
Uploaded: | 2022-11-28 |
Last sync: | 2024-12-02 04:00 |
Citation
Citation formatting is not guaranteed to be accurate. | |
MLA Full: | "Why Protons Are Still Such a Mystery to Scientists." YouTube, uploaded by SciShow, 28 November 2022, www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFoDOSzBM2I. |
MLA Inline: | (SciShow, 2022) |
APA Full: | SciShow. (2022, November 28). Why Protons Are Still Such a Mystery to Scientists [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=nFoDOSzBM2I |
APA Inline: | (SciShow, 2022) |
Chicago Full: |
SciShow, "Why Protons Are Still Such a Mystery to Scientists.", November 28, 2022, YouTube, 06:16, https://youtube.com/watch?v=nFoDOSzBM2I. |
Visit https://brilliant.org/scishow/ to get started learning STEM for free, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription.
Protons make up most of the regular matter int he universe, but we're still figuring out a few of their quirks... Or quarks. Join Hank Green and learn why protons are still so mysterious to scientists, and what we've discovered about them so far!
Hosted by: Hank Green (he/him)
SciShow is on TikTok! Check us out at https://www.tiktok.com/@scishow
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever:
Matt Curls, Alisa Sherbow, Dr. Melvin Sanicas, Harrison Mills, Adam Brainard, Chris Peters, charles george, Piya Shedden, Alex Hackman, Christopher R, Boucher, Jeffrey Mckishen, Ash, Silas Emrys, Eric Jensen, Kevin Bealer, Jason A Saslow, Tom Mosner, Tomás Lagos González, Jacob, Christoph Schwanke, Sam Lutfi, Bryan Cloer
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
SciShow Tangents Podcast: https://scishow-tangents.simplecast.com/
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
#SciShow #science #education
----------
Sources:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04998-2
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02237-2
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02186-w
https://newscientist.com/article/2334076-physicists-surprised-to-discover-the-proton-contains-a-charm-quark/
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/proton-charm-quark-up-down-particle-physics
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0370269380903640
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.082001
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ahep/2015/231547/
https://www.quantamagazine.org/decades-long-quest-reveals-details-of-the-protons-inner-antimatter-20210224/
https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.1.20210412a/full/
https://pdg.lbl.gov/2022/tables/contents_tables.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Particles/quark.html
images
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg
https://home.web.cern.ch/resources/video/physics/z-e-e-collision-event-animation
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/theoretical-physics-quark-and-gluon-subatomic-royalty-free-image/1383824896?phrase=quark
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/video/shimmering-shiny-particles-beautiful-background-loop-stock-footage/1369664635?phrase=particles&adppopup=true
https://home.web.cern.ch/resources/image/computing/computing-images-gallery
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/theoretical-physics-quark-and-gluon-simulation-3d-royalty-free-image/1383824752?phrase=quark%20physics&adppopup=true
https://home.web.cern.ch/resources/video/experiments/cms-ls2-footage-4k
Welp...Maybe We Were Wrong About Protons
The charmed life of the proton
Protons make up most of the regular matter int he universe, but we're still figuring out a few of their quirks... Or quarks. Join Hank Green and learn why protons are still so mysterious to scientists, and what we've discovered about them so far!
Hosted by: Hank Green (he/him)
SciShow is on TikTok! Check us out at https://www.tiktok.com/@scishow
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever:
Matt Curls, Alisa Sherbow, Dr. Melvin Sanicas, Harrison Mills, Adam Brainard, Chris Peters, charles george, Piya Shedden, Alex Hackman, Christopher R, Boucher, Jeffrey Mckishen, Ash, Silas Emrys, Eric Jensen, Kevin Bealer, Jason A Saslow, Tom Mosner, Tomás Lagos González, Jacob, Christoph Schwanke, Sam Lutfi, Bryan Cloer
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
SciShow Tangents Podcast: https://scishow-tangents.simplecast.com/
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
#SciShow #science #education
----------
Sources:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04998-2
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02237-2
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02186-w
https://newscientist.com/article/2334076-physicists-surprised-to-discover-the-proton-contains-a-charm-quark/
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/proton-charm-quark-up-down-particle-physics
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0370269380903640
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.082001
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ahep/2015/231547/
https://www.quantamagazine.org/decades-long-quest-reveals-details-of-the-protons-inner-antimatter-20210224/
https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.1.20210412a/full/
https://pdg.lbl.gov/2022/tables/contents_tables.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Particles/quark.html
images
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg
https://home.web.cern.ch/resources/video/physics/z-e-e-collision-event-animation
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/theoretical-physics-quark-and-gluon-subatomic-royalty-free-image/1383824896?phrase=quark
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/video/shimmering-shiny-particles-beautiful-background-loop-stock-footage/1369664635?phrase=particles&adppopup=true
https://home.web.cern.ch/resources/image/computing/computing-images-gallery
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/theoretical-physics-quark-and-gluon-simulation-3d-royalty-free-image/1383824752?phrase=quark%20physics&adppopup=true
https://home.web.cern.ch/resources/video/experiments/cms-ls2-footage-4k
Welp...Maybe We Were Wrong About Protons
The charmed life of the proton
Thanks to Brilliant for supporting this SciShow video.
To keep building your STEM skills beyond this video, check out Brilliant.org/SciShow. You’ll get 20% off an annual premium subscription when you use that link! [ intro ] Imagine putting a house on a really big scale and weighing the whole thing.
And then you break it down and weigh all of the individual pieces separately. And then you find one brick that’s heavier than the whole house. That can’t be right, that’s impossible.
But in the weird world of subatomic physics it could totally happen, and new research has found evidence for it inside protons. So, if the proton is a proverbial house, that brick is a charm quark, and learning more about it might help us understand the biggest mysteries in particle physics. Every atom in the universe has at least one proton inside of it. In fact, protons make up most of the regular matter out there.
And thanks to decades of particle physics research, we know that protons are made of even smaller particles called quarks. Specifically, protons are made of two fundamental ‘flavors’ of quark: ‘up’ flavored quarks and ‘down’ flavored quarks. Or at least, that’s what we’ve thought until recently.
Because new research says this may not be the whole story. Some physicists have proposed that in addition to those quarks, There is another fundamental component to the proton: a charm quark. A charm quark is another flavor of quark, behaving exactly like an up quark, only with a lot more mass.
A single charm quark is more massive than an entire proton! So yeah, the idea of protons being built from them sounds a little bizarre. But it’s physically plausible because of another strange rule.
On this teeny tiny scale of reality, everything comes down to probabilities. Physicists use equations to describe the possible outcomes for which quarks they will see when they observe a proton. They do this by smashing protons together at high speeds and watching what particles are formed from all that energy.
About 99.5% of the time, when they observe a proton in these situations, they see it’s made of up quarks and down quarks as expected. But the other 0.5% of the time, they see it’s made of a charm quark, too. Because the charm quarks are there so infrequently and they’re short-lived, they only contribute a small amount of their enormous mass to the overall mass of the proton in the equations that describe these things.
That is how the brick can weigh more than the house. So, physicists do see short-lived charm quarks come out of protons all the time. But they call them extrinsic charm quarks, because they’re not thought to be a component of protons when we’re not smashing them together and creating all kinds of new particles.
Some physicists, however, have theorized that there are also intrinsic charm quarks fundamental building blocks that exist whether we are tinkering with protons in a particle accelerator or not. And finding evidence that protons are really made of charm quarks turns out to be a lot more difficult. Physicists have been chasing after subtle hints of intrinsic charm quarks for decades, but there’s a big effect that may be masking it.
Every proton also has a roiling ‘sea’ of particles popping in and out of existence, buzzing around at all times. Physicists have to hunt through that noise to find intrinsic charm quarks. If you don’t go into the data analysis with a particular model in mind, you can’t really wade through all that noise.
And there are lots of plausible models of intrinsic charm, so generally physicists have to go through each model one at a time to see if the data match. But research published in August 2022 used a new trick: machine learning. The team fed 30 years of particle collision data into a computer, including hot-off-the-press data from the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland.
Then they told the computer to look for evidence of intrinsic charm quarks, using whatever model it needed to. But it was also allowed to assume there was no intrinsic charm quark. Because that’s always a possibility, too.
By looking at loads of different models at once, it could identify which ones fit the data best way more effectively than previous attempts. And sure enough, the researchers did find evidence for intrinsic charm quarks. They even calculated the probability of spotting one of them: around 0.6%. But is this evidence actual proof?
The team says there’s only a one in one thousand chance they’re wrong. But in the world of particle physics, that is not good enough. Before anyone can actually claim a discovery has been made, they have to show there’s only a one in three million chance they’re wrong.
I mean we are talking about the fundamental rules of reality here. The standards should be pretty high! Whether or not protons really do have this intrinsic charm quark, these sorts of ultra-precise tests are crucial for the future of particle physics.
Researchers are probing ever-deeper into the smallest parts of reality, and that requires an extreme level of accuracy… both in the experimental design, and the understanding of laws of nature. That way, if experiments don’t match what those laws predict will happen, they can be sure it’s because of something new and exciting, not some kind of accounting error. And if this new evidence holds up, then we’ve learned a new fact about the nature of reality… and about a particle that we are all made of.
That’s an idea that really has some intrinsic charm. You made it to the end of the video, so you probably think quantum objects have some merit. But if we lost you at any point along the way, you might want to check out the Brilliant course on quantum objects.
Brilliant is an online learning platform that offers guided problem-solving based courses in math, science, and engineering. They’ve supported SciShow for many years and we’re happy to have them support this video as well. Their quantum objects course has 18 interactive lessons that cover over 100 concepts and exercises.
And that is just one of their courses! In this course, you’ll learn things like how sneaky tiny objects can be. The first lesson explains how they can still be mixed up even after you sort them.
And at the end of the course, you’ll have a new appreciation for the small physics that enables lasers, transistors, and other defining technologies of the modern world. To try this course or any other Brilliant course for free, click the link in the description down below or visit Brilliant.org/SciShow. That link also gives you 20% off an annual Premium subscription. [ outro ]
To keep building your STEM skills beyond this video, check out Brilliant.org/SciShow. You’ll get 20% off an annual premium subscription when you use that link! [ intro ] Imagine putting a house on a really big scale and weighing the whole thing.
And then you break it down and weigh all of the individual pieces separately. And then you find one brick that’s heavier than the whole house. That can’t be right, that’s impossible.
But in the weird world of subatomic physics it could totally happen, and new research has found evidence for it inside protons. So, if the proton is a proverbial house, that brick is a charm quark, and learning more about it might help us understand the biggest mysteries in particle physics. Every atom in the universe has at least one proton inside of it. In fact, protons make up most of the regular matter out there.
And thanks to decades of particle physics research, we know that protons are made of even smaller particles called quarks. Specifically, protons are made of two fundamental ‘flavors’ of quark: ‘up’ flavored quarks and ‘down’ flavored quarks. Or at least, that’s what we’ve thought until recently.
Because new research says this may not be the whole story. Some physicists have proposed that in addition to those quarks, There is another fundamental component to the proton: a charm quark. A charm quark is another flavor of quark, behaving exactly like an up quark, only with a lot more mass.
A single charm quark is more massive than an entire proton! So yeah, the idea of protons being built from them sounds a little bizarre. But it’s physically plausible because of another strange rule.
On this teeny tiny scale of reality, everything comes down to probabilities. Physicists use equations to describe the possible outcomes for which quarks they will see when they observe a proton. They do this by smashing protons together at high speeds and watching what particles are formed from all that energy.
About 99.5% of the time, when they observe a proton in these situations, they see it’s made of up quarks and down quarks as expected. But the other 0.5% of the time, they see it’s made of a charm quark, too. Because the charm quarks are there so infrequently and they’re short-lived, they only contribute a small amount of their enormous mass to the overall mass of the proton in the equations that describe these things.
That is how the brick can weigh more than the house. So, physicists do see short-lived charm quarks come out of protons all the time. But they call them extrinsic charm quarks, because they’re not thought to be a component of protons when we’re not smashing them together and creating all kinds of new particles.
Some physicists, however, have theorized that there are also intrinsic charm quarks fundamental building blocks that exist whether we are tinkering with protons in a particle accelerator or not. And finding evidence that protons are really made of charm quarks turns out to be a lot more difficult. Physicists have been chasing after subtle hints of intrinsic charm quarks for decades, but there’s a big effect that may be masking it.
Every proton also has a roiling ‘sea’ of particles popping in and out of existence, buzzing around at all times. Physicists have to hunt through that noise to find intrinsic charm quarks. If you don’t go into the data analysis with a particular model in mind, you can’t really wade through all that noise.
And there are lots of plausible models of intrinsic charm, so generally physicists have to go through each model one at a time to see if the data match. But research published in August 2022 used a new trick: machine learning. The team fed 30 years of particle collision data into a computer, including hot-off-the-press data from the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland.
Then they told the computer to look for evidence of intrinsic charm quarks, using whatever model it needed to. But it was also allowed to assume there was no intrinsic charm quark. Because that’s always a possibility, too.
By looking at loads of different models at once, it could identify which ones fit the data best way more effectively than previous attempts. And sure enough, the researchers did find evidence for intrinsic charm quarks. They even calculated the probability of spotting one of them: around 0.6%. But is this evidence actual proof?
The team says there’s only a one in one thousand chance they’re wrong. But in the world of particle physics, that is not good enough. Before anyone can actually claim a discovery has been made, they have to show there’s only a one in three million chance they’re wrong.
I mean we are talking about the fundamental rules of reality here. The standards should be pretty high! Whether or not protons really do have this intrinsic charm quark, these sorts of ultra-precise tests are crucial for the future of particle physics.
Researchers are probing ever-deeper into the smallest parts of reality, and that requires an extreme level of accuracy… both in the experimental design, and the understanding of laws of nature. That way, if experiments don’t match what those laws predict will happen, they can be sure it’s because of something new and exciting, not some kind of accounting error. And if this new evidence holds up, then we’ve learned a new fact about the nature of reality… and about a particle that we are all made of.
That’s an idea that really has some intrinsic charm. You made it to the end of the video, so you probably think quantum objects have some merit. But if we lost you at any point along the way, you might want to check out the Brilliant course on quantum objects.
Brilliant is an online learning platform that offers guided problem-solving based courses in math, science, and engineering. They’ve supported SciShow for many years and we’re happy to have them support this video as well. Their quantum objects course has 18 interactive lessons that cover over 100 concepts and exercises.
And that is just one of their courses! In this course, you’ll learn things like how sneaky tiny objects can be. The first lesson explains how they can still be mixed up even after you sort them.
And at the end of the course, you’ll have a new appreciation for the small physics that enables lasers, transistors, and other defining technologies of the modern world. To try this course or any other Brilliant course for free, click the link in the description down below or visit Brilliant.org/SciShow. That link also gives you 20% off an annual Premium subscription. [ outro ]