YouTube: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mc2aso6W7jQ
Previous: Influence, Airports, and the Nerdfighter Book Club
Next: TFIOS Movie Madness, Incongruent, and Headless Hotel People

Categories

Statistics

View count:886,667
Likes:32,894
Dislikes:1,003
Comments:3,455
Duration:03:43
Uploaded:2014-05-02
Last sync:2018-05-05 13:40
In which Hank debates Hank on one of the most important debates in the United States today, whether to keep the internet open or to allow cable companies to open fast lanes (and slow lanes) for different parts of the internet to flow through.

Please make a public comment here!
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/begin;jsessionid=TFmyTjMJKDBVQnXrFWl2rhv2ytzklrNdtXdfVL8J1l2B2DB2QRLD!1675925370!1281169505?procName=14-28&filedFrom=X

Tell the FCC that they should reclassify broadband internet as a telecommunications (or "Common carrier") service. Right now broadband is regulated like TV or radio, which doesn't make sense.

This is a public comment for the public record...official government stuff... so you'll have to include your actual name and address.

You can also email the FCC directly here: http://dft.ba/-tell_the_FCC

If you want to help some organizations that work their butts off trying to fight the telecoms, check out:

Save The Internet (from FreePress) http://www.savetheinternet.com/sti-home

Public Knowledge: http://www.publicknowledge.org/

And contact your congress people: http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml
Good morning, John. Today we're going to be doing something a little bit different. I'm gonna be holding a debate here in my house around the topic of net neutrality, featuring me, an internet user and me, representing a cable company, on opposite sides of the table, literally.

Internet User Hank: First things first, for the viewers at home I think we should just define what net neutrality is.  

Cable Company Hank: Sounds like a fine place to begin.

IUH: So net neutrality is the idea that internet service providers should provide access to all of the internet at the same speed: no matter what content it is, no one gets any preference.

CCH: Fair definition; the question is: is that a good idea? Like why should I, an internet service provider, have to provide Game of Thrones via BitTorrent at the same speed as I provide it through HBO Go?

IUH: I don't know, cause you're not a law enforcement agency and that's not your job, but like, you shouldn't be determining how your users use your service. It's the internet; you just provide access to it and, but like, my concern is that if you do it to BitTorrent that you'll do it to, like, a legitimate competitor to your business, like Netflix for example.

CCH: No one is talking about doing that.

IUH: I mean, you say that, but yeah they are. Like Comcast literally slowed down Netflix's internet connection and forced them to pay to get faster access to their customers; like it happened already. 


CCH: Netflix is responsible  for over 30% of the bandwidth use of the US. Why should all of our customers, regardless of whether they use Netflix, be required to pay for the massive infrastructure upgrades necessary to provide that service? Of course Netflix should pay. But, we're not talking about slowing down Netflix to make them pay. We're just saying we're going to speed Netflix up if they do pay.

IUH: I mean if you sped Netflix up without adding any new bandwidth, wouldn't you definitionally slow someone else down in order to speed Netflix up? You are, right now, for the first time in American history, making the internet a non-level playing field. You talk high and mighty about economic efficiency, but what creates great economies is not profit; it's competition, which is what you're trying to destroy.


CCH: I mean, the internet's a mature industry now; we can't keep running around like it's 1998 hippie-fun-feel-good times. It's time to buckle down and turn this thing into a real economic engine. We want to charge customers for access to content and charge content companies for access to the customers. We get paid twice, it's great for us!

IUH: The internet is not your business model. The internet is a massive, technological, and economic, and cultural force for good that everyone should have equal access to, and your place as a middle-man does not bequeath you magical powers to extract value at every turn! You have no right to decide what information goes at what speed through your pipes.

CCH: I mean, don't we though? We're already doing it with Netflix; we kind of already set the precedent. Let's face it, this is a complicated legal thing, and with the potential upside for us, we can afford a lot of lawyers and lobbyists. No offense, but I don't think you can play on our level.

IUH: I guess we'll see. John, I'll see you on Tuesday.


Hi. I'm a little bit worried about this. I want the internet to remain open and neutral in America... for selfish and also altruistic reasons. You can help. And please do; the FCC is currently asking for comments. Please go to comment at the FCC's website, there's a link in the description. Tell them to classify broadband internet as a common carrier service, which will prevent telecoms from making the internet a closed, non-neutral place. If you want to help in more long-term ways, in the description there are a few organizations that are working on these issues, actually hiring lawyers and lobbyists to compete with the telecoms. You can give them money; you can give them your time; you can give them your action, and you can call your congress people. I love the internet a lot and I bet that you do too, and I am worried what's gonna happen if we let the middlemen decide what the internet is like. Frankly, I don't trust 'em.