scishow
How Intergalactic Particles Are Attacking Your Laptop
YouTube: | https://youtube.com/watch?v=YeJeoPCSpO8 |
Previous: | 5 Incredible Science Facts About Babies |
Next: | The First Known Bird Could Fly, But Super Awkwardly |
Categories
Statistics
View count: | 201,671 |
Likes: | 6,625 |
Comments: | 385 |
Duration: | 06:28 |
Uploaded: | 2018-03-15 |
Last sync: | 2024-11-24 01:15 |
Citation
Citation formatting is not guaranteed to be accurate. | |
MLA Full: | "How Intergalactic Particles Are Attacking Your Laptop." YouTube, uploaded by SciShow, 15 March 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeJeoPCSpO8. |
MLA Inline: | (SciShow, 2018) |
APA Full: | SciShow. (2018, March 15). How Intergalactic Particles Are Attacking Your Laptop [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=YeJeoPCSpO8 |
APA Inline: | (SciShow, 2018) |
Chicago Full: |
SciShow, "How Intergalactic Particles Are Attacking Your Laptop.", March 15, 2018, YouTube, 06:28, https://youtube.com/watch?v=YeJeoPCSpO8. |
The first 77 viewers to sign up over at brilliant.org/scishow will get 20% off their annual premium subscription: https://brilliant.org/scishow
In the early 1980s IBM engineers had a hard time to to figure out inexplicable computer module failures in Denver, Colorado. When they finally cracked the puzzle, the cause turned out to be otherworldly.
Hosted by: Stefan Chin
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters: Lazarus G, Kelly Landrum Jones, Sam Lutfi, Kevin Knupp, Nicholas Smith, D.A. Noe, alexander wadsworth, سلطان الخليفي, Piya Shedden, KatieMarie Magnone, Scott Satovsky Jr, Charles Southerland, Bader AlGhamdi, James Harshaw, Patrick Merrithew, Patrick D. Ashmore, Candy, Tim Curwick, charles george, Saul, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Viraansh Bhanushali, Kevin Bealer, Philippe von Bergen, Chris Peters, Justin Lentz
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
----------
Sources:
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/a-flash-then-we-plunged/story-e6freuy9-1111117691511
www.smh.com.au/good-weekend/the-untold-story-of-qf72-what-happens-when-psycho-automation-leaves-pilots-powerless-20170510-gw26ae.html
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1479948
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220497892_Field_testing_for_cosmic_ray_soft_errors_in_semiconductor_memories
https://www.eng.auburn.edu/~agrawvd/TALKS/tutorial_6pg.pdf
http://www.pld.ttu.ee/IAF0030/curtis.pdf
https://www.sciencemag.org/content/206/4420/776#aff-2
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.4.29
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118479308
https://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/how-to-kill-a-supercomputer-dirty-power-cosmic-rays-and-bad-solder
https://phys.org/news/2017-02-particles-outer-space-wreaking-low-grade.html
Interview with Bharat Bhuva
Image Source:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crshower2_nasa.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ram_chip.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Windows_XP_BSOD.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/18/U.S._Department_of_Energy_-_Science_-_477_015_010_%289737767578%29.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inside_Suite.jpg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewfhart/8106189987
:
In the early 1980s IBM engineers had a hard time to to figure out inexplicable computer module failures in Denver, Colorado. When they finally cracked the puzzle, the cause turned out to be otherworldly.
Hosted by: Stefan Chin
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters: Lazarus G, Kelly Landrum Jones, Sam Lutfi, Kevin Knupp, Nicholas Smith, D.A. Noe, alexander wadsworth, سلطان الخليفي, Piya Shedden, KatieMarie Magnone, Scott Satovsky Jr, Charles Southerland, Bader AlGhamdi, James Harshaw, Patrick Merrithew, Patrick D. Ashmore, Candy, Tim Curwick, charles george, Saul, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Viraansh Bhanushali, Kevin Bealer, Philippe von Bergen, Chris Peters, Justin Lentz
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
----------
Sources:
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/a-flash-then-we-plunged/story-e6freuy9-1111117691511
www.smh.com.au/good-weekend/the-untold-story-of-qf72-what-happens-when-psycho-automation-leaves-pilots-powerless-20170510-gw26ae.html
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1479948
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220497892_Field_testing_for_cosmic_ray_soft_errors_in_semiconductor_memories
https://www.eng.auburn.edu/~agrawvd/TALKS/tutorial_6pg.pdf
http://www.pld.ttu.ee/IAF0030/curtis.pdf
https://www.sciencemag.org/content/206/4420/776#aff-2
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.4.29
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118479308
https://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/how-to-kill-a-supercomputer-dirty-power-cosmic-rays-and-bad-solder
https://phys.org/news/2017-02-particles-outer-space-wreaking-low-grade.html
Interview with Bharat Bhuva
Image Source:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crshower2_nasa.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ram_chip.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Windows_XP_BSOD.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/18/U.S._Department_of_Energy_-_Science_-_477_015_010_%289737767578%29.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inside_Suite.jpg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewfhart/8106189987
:
SciShow is supported by Brilliant.org. [♪ INTRO ].
In the early 1980s, IBM engineers had a problem. In most of the US, when a computer’s memory module failed, a few tests would make it clear what was wrong.
But in Denver, Colorado, 80% of failures were inexplicable. Every test would show the modules working perfectly. When IBM finally cracked the puzzle, the cause turned out to be otherworldly.
And I am not saying it’s aliens because it wasn’t aliens, it was cosmic rays. These intergalactic visitors can wreak havoc on electronics, and they’re playing an ever-greater role in how computers are designed. A cosmic ray is actually a tiny particle, usually a hydrogen or helium nucleus.
And they get flung toward us at up to 99% of the speed of light by a far-away supernova or some other astronomical mayhem. Scientists had known since the 1950s that radiation made electronics go haywire, whether the high-energy particles came from the Sun or atomic bombs. And spacecraft had been dealing with cosmic radiation for decades.
But down on Earth, everyone had thought we were protected by the atmosphere. And it’s true that the atmosphere protects us from direct hits. But cosmic rays are packed with energy. So when one smacks into an air molecule, it doesn’t just disappear.
Instead, the collision spews out a zoo of other particles called secondary rays, each carrying just a bit of the energy—but still enough to come out moving fast. Most of these secondary rays get absorbed or deflected by other air molecules. But every so often, one makes it all the way down to the ground.
And you know what else hangs out on the ground? Computers. Inside of your computer, electrons are flowing around—there’re the physical embodiment of your emails, software, and Netflix streams.
Many of the electrons park in your computer’s memory—the RAM chip. They’re moving in and out of microscopic electrical reservoirs to store 1’s and 0’s, or bits,. Now, a stray neutron from that secondary ray shower might crash into the nucleus of a silicon atom in the RAM, passing on a jolt of energy that tears apart that nucleus.
It’s a tiny nuclear fission reaction, the same thing that’s happening in a nuclear reactor! And as positively-charged fragments of the nucleus zoom through the chip, they yank around negatively-charged electrons. And sometimes, a few thousand electrons get dragged into or out of a reservoir in the.
RAM. When that happens, a 1 becomes a 0 , or vice versa. And the cosmic ray has corrupted the contents of the computer’s memory.
Scientists call this a single-event upset, or SEU. “Single event” just means there’s no lasting damage to the chip. So if you test the memory afterwards, everything’s A-OK. It’s what people call a “soft error.” Even though secondary rays are everywhere, the higher up you are, the more neutrons reach you, since they’ve had fewer chances to collide with air molecules.
And that’s why computers in Denver, the mile-high city, were having extra temporary memory failures. Mystery solved. Aside from the occasional blue screen of death, most SEUs don’t cause noticeable problems.
After all, who cares if one pixel in Game of Thrones is off? But every so often, things have gotten more dramatic. In 2003, a voting machine in Schaerbeek, Belgium added 4,096 votes to one candidate’s total because of a single flipped bit.
And in 2008, a Qantas passenger jet suddenly nose-dived hundreds of feet in 20 seconds, sending passengers crashing into the ceiling. It’s hard to say for sure, but the most likely explanation in both cases is cosmic rays. Because of the need to guard against high-altitude incidents like the Qantas flight, the aerospace industry has done a lot of the research on protecting electronics against radiation.
And devices with lots of memory or that work continuously for days need some extra protection too, like supercomputers, server farms, even networking equipment. But as technology advances, SEUs are a growing problem even for things like cell phones, computerized car engines, and smart doorbells. And circuits keep getting smaller, making it easier to flip a bit.
At the same time, we keep packing in more transistors, the key silicon component in. RAM and other electronics, giving more targets for particles to disrupt. So engineers have come up with three main lines of defense.
First, by changing the spacing of the transistor components to limit how much charge can move around, they can minimize the chance of errors. The second strategy is to detect and reverse errors right in the RAM. Error checking and correcting RAM, or ECC RAM keeps tabs on how many 1s there should be in each block of memory, which allows the chip to locate the error and flip it back.
ECC RAM is widely used in data centers, and you can get it for home computers, too. And finally, you can just accept that errors are going to happen and try to work around them. The extreme version of this, used in spacecraft and planes, is to run multiple identical circuits at the same time and restart any calculation when their results don’t match.
But you can also just have software stay on the lookout for fishy-looking data or tolerate some imprecision. Each solution has its cost, whether in power, size, speed, or money. But sometimes it’s worth it, especially if the electronics are keeping people alive.
And as we keep using more, smaller electronics, we have to pay more attention to fending off these cosmic rays that are slamming into our planet from across the universe. As we’re well aware at SciShow, humans are skilled at building things to survive pretty much any environment. Whether it’s protecting our electronics against cosmic radiation or protecting 100-story skyscrapers from earthquakes, there’s a lot of math and physics involved in maintaining our way of life.
SciShow’s sponsor Brilliant.org teaches you to think like a scientist with dozens of interactive quizzes. And since high-altitude is the theme of the day, I thought we could try this Skyscrapers quiz together. [Go to b-roll of this quiz: https://brilliant.org/practice/skyscrapers/?chapter=infrastructure.] So we’re going into the last part of the infrastructure course which is about the skyscrapers. So preparing you think about skyscrapers, it’s having you think about stacking up bunch of books and whether will become more or less stable.
So I think it becomes less stable, and got it! And then we get to the question where we’re trying to figure out how the wind speed is going to be affected by these multiple tall buildings next to each other. And there is a previous question that asks you about placing your thumb over the end of the hose and how that affects the water, and in that case when you’re blocking a part of the flow, the water speeds up.
So in this case, the building is blocking a part of the flow, so I think that the wind is going to speed up, and I got it! And towards the end of the quiz there is a little video in here of skyscrapers actually swing back and forth in the wind, and it’s teaching you about how engineers can use large tanks of water to actually counteract the weight of that swinging. Which I think that’s pretty cool.
So if you wanna check it out yourself and help support SciShow, the first 77 viewers to sign up over at brilliant.org/scishow will get 20% off their annual premium subscription. [♪ OUTRO ].
In the early 1980s, IBM engineers had a problem. In most of the US, when a computer’s memory module failed, a few tests would make it clear what was wrong.
But in Denver, Colorado, 80% of failures were inexplicable. Every test would show the modules working perfectly. When IBM finally cracked the puzzle, the cause turned out to be otherworldly.
And I am not saying it’s aliens because it wasn’t aliens, it was cosmic rays. These intergalactic visitors can wreak havoc on electronics, and they’re playing an ever-greater role in how computers are designed. A cosmic ray is actually a tiny particle, usually a hydrogen or helium nucleus.
And they get flung toward us at up to 99% of the speed of light by a far-away supernova or some other astronomical mayhem. Scientists had known since the 1950s that radiation made electronics go haywire, whether the high-energy particles came from the Sun or atomic bombs. And spacecraft had been dealing with cosmic radiation for decades.
But down on Earth, everyone had thought we were protected by the atmosphere. And it’s true that the atmosphere protects us from direct hits. But cosmic rays are packed with energy. So when one smacks into an air molecule, it doesn’t just disappear.
Instead, the collision spews out a zoo of other particles called secondary rays, each carrying just a bit of the energy—but still enough to come out moving fast. Most of these secondary rays get absorbed or deflected by other air molecules. But every so often, one makes it all the way down to the ground.
And you know what else hangs out on the ground? Computers. Inside of your computer, electrons are flowing around—there’re the physical embodiment of your emails, software, and Netflix streams.
Many of the electrons park in your computer’s memory—the RAM chip. They’re moving in and out of microscopic electrical reservoirs to store 1’s and 0’s, or bits,. Now, a stray neutron from that secondary ray shower might crash into the nucleus of a silicon atom in the RAM, passing on a jolt of energy that tears apart that nucleus.
It’s a tiny nuclear fission reaction, the same thing that’s happening in a nuclear reactor! And as positively-charged fragments of the nucleus zoom through the chip, they yank around negatively-charged electrons. And sometimes, a few thousand electrons get dragged into or out of a reservoir in the.
RAM. When that happens, a 1 becomes a 0 , or vice versa. And the cosmic ray has corrupted the contents of the computer’s memory.
Scientists call this a single-event upset, or SEU. “Single event” just means there’s no lasting damage to the chip. So if you test the memory afterwards, everything’s A-OK. It’s what people call a “soft error.” Even though secondary rays are everywhere, the higher up you are, the more neutrons reach you, since they’ve had fewer chances to collide with air molecules.
And that’s why computers in Denver, the mile-high city, were having extra temporary memory failures. Mystery solved. Aside from the occasional blue screen of death, most SEUs don’t cause noticeable problems.
After all, who cares if one pixel in Game of Thrones is off? But every so often, things have gotten more dramatic. In 2003, a voting machine in Schaerbeek, Belgium added 4,096 votes to one candidate’s total because of a single flipped bit.
And in 2008, a Qantas passenger jet suddenly nose-dived hundreds of feet in 20 seconds, sending passengers crashing into the ceiling. It’s hard to say for sure, but the most likely explanation in both cases is cosmic rays. Because of the need to guard against high-altitude incidents like the Qantas flight, the aerospace industry has done a lot of the research on protecting electronics against radiation.
And devices with lots of memory or that work continuously for days need some extra protection too, like supercomputers, server farms, even networking equipment. But as technology advances, SEUs are a growing problem even for things like cell phones, computerized car engines, and smart doorbells. And circuits keep getting smaller, making it easier to flip a bit.
At the same time, we keep packing in more transistors, the key silicon component in. RAM and other electronics, giving more targets for particles to disrupt. So engineers have come up with three main lines of defense.
First, by changing the spacing of the transistor components to limit how much charge can move around, they can minimize the chance of errors. The second strategy is to detect and reverse errors right in the RAM. Error checking and correcting RAM, or ECC RAM keeps tabs on how many 1s there should be in each block of memory, which allows the chip to locate the error and flip it back.
ECC RAM is widely used in data centers, and you can get it for home computers, too. And finally, you can just accept that errors are going to happen and try to work around them. The extreme version of this, used in spacecraft and planes, is to run multiple identical circuits at the same time and restart any calculation when their results don’t match.
But you can also just have software stay on the lookout for fishy-looking data or tolerate some imprecision. Each solution has its cost, whether in power, size, speed, or money. But sometimes it’s worth it, especially if the electronics are keeping people alive.
And as we keep using more, smaller electronics, we have to pay more attention to fending off these cosmic rays that are slamming into our planet from across the universe. As we’re well aware at SciShow, humans are skilled at building things to survive pretty much any environment. Whether it’s protecting our electronics against cosmic radiation or protecting 100-story skyscrapers from earthquakes, there’s a lot of math and physics involved in maintaining our way of life.
SciShow’s sponsor Brilliant.org teaches you to think like a scientist with dozens of interactive quizzes. And since high-altitude is the theme of the day, I thought we could try this Skyscrapers quiz together. [Go to b-roll of this quiz: https://brilliant.org/practice/skyscrapers/?chapter=infrastructure.] So we’re going into the last part of the infrastructure course which is about the skyscrapers. So preparing you think about skyscrapers, it’s having you think about stacking up bunch of books and whether will become more or less stable.
So I think it becomes less stable, and got it! And then we get to the question where we’re trying to figure out how the wind speed is going to be affected by these multiple tall buildings next to each other. And there is a previous question that asks you about placing your thumb over the end of the hose and how that affects the water, and in that case when you’re blocking a part of the flow, the water speeds up.
So in this case, the building is blocking a part of the flow, so I think that the wind is going to speed up, and I got it! And towards the end of the quiz there is a little video in here of skyscrapers actually swing back and forth in the wind, and it’s teaching you about how engineers can use large tanks of water to actually counteract the weight of that swinging. Which I think that’s pretty cool.
So if you wanna check it out yourself and help support SciShow, the first 77 viewers to sign up over at brilliant.org/scishow will get 20% off their annual premium subscription. [♪ OUTRO ].