scishow
The Moon Isn't As Dead As You Think
YouTube: | https://youtube.com/watch?v=8StI2PyQCos |
Previous: | When your stomach can't dissolve it, Coke can. #shorts #science #SciShow |
Next: | Where Are A Whale's Nipples? |
Categories
Statistics
View count: | 229,576 |
Likes: | 11,393 |
Comments: | 499 |
Duration: | 07:42 |
Uploaded: | 2023-02-22 |
Last sync: | 2024-12-19 14:00 |
Citation
Citation formatting is not guaranteed to be accurate. | |
MLA Full: | "The Moon Isn't As Dead As You Think." YouTube, uploaded by SciShow, 22 February 2023, www.youtube.com/watch?v=8StI2PyQCos. |
MLA Inline: | (SciShow, 2023) |
APA Full: | SciShow. (2023, February 22). The Moon Isn't As Dead As You Think [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=8StI2PyQCos |
APA Inline: | (SciShow, 2023) |
Chicago Full: |
SciShow, "The Moon Isn't As Dead As You Think.", February 22, 2023, YouTube, 07:42, https://youtube.com/watch?v=8StI2PyQCos. |
This video was sponsored by 80,000 Hours. Head to https://80000hours.org/scishow to be sent a free copy of their in-depth career guide and sign up for their newsletter.
The Moon may appear to be a dead, grey rock, whose geologic activity petered out billions of years ago. But not so fast! Recent studies suggest that parts of the surface could be much younger, and stuff beneath the surface could be a-rumbling even now!
Hosted by: Stefan Chin
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever: Matt Curls, Alisa Sherbow, Dr. Melvin Sanicas, Harrison Mills, Adam Brainard, Chris Peters, charles george, Piya Shedden, Alex Hackman, Christopher R, Boucher, Jeffrey Mckishen, Ash, Silas Emrys, Eric Jensen, Kevin Bealer, Jason A Saslow, Tom Mosner, Tomás Lagos González, Jacob, Christoph Schwanke, Sam Lutfi, Bryan Cloer
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
SciShow Tangents Podcast: https://scishow-tangents.simplecast.com/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishowFacebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
#SciShow #science #education #learning #complexly
----------
Sources:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11214-019-0622-x
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2002JE001985
https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2252
https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aba8949
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02744-8
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04100-2
https://www.science.org/content/article/long-live-moon
https://www.science.org/content/article/recent-volcanic-eruptions-moon
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2000/pdf/1919.pdf
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/968290
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JE005826
http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Nov06/MoonGas.html
https://www.brown.edu/news/2017-03-28/ina
https://www.esrf.fr/news/general/lunar-volcanism/index_html
https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1402
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063313002286
https://astronomycommunity.nature.com/posts/the-moon-s-last-gasp-dating-the-youngest-lunar-sample
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.3819.pdf
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1251117
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/lroc-20110712-age.html
https://academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/44/4/4.21/195239?searchresult=1
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/radiometric-age-dating.htm
https://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Feature/3207
https://www.brown.edu/news/2020-04-30/tectonics
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11214-020-00709-3
https://moon.nasa.gov/system/downloadable_items/82_backb.pdf
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/study-finds-new-wrinkles-on-earths-moon
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/ames/lunar-origins-simulations
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/maps.13119
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/06/200622095019.htm
Image Sources:
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/video/modern-moon-stock-footage/1047389688?phrase=moon&adppopup=true
https://moon.nasa.gov/resources/331/the-apollo-15-hammer-feather-drop/?category=videos
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/13796
https://images.nasa.gov/details-ARC-20221004-AAV3443-MoonOrigin-Social-NASAWeb-1080p
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clementine_albedo_simp750.jpg
https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/orion-s-moon-crater-close-up
https://moon.nasa.gov/resources/257/view-of-goclenius-and-other-craters/?category=images
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/13537
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/10930
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ilifg26TZrI
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/moon-in-outer-space-royalty-free-image/1395983416?phrase=moon&adppopup=true
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo_Crew_Big_Bertha.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chang%27e-5_soil_samples.png
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo_12_Conrad_with_moon_rocks.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ina_hrp219a.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ina_(LRO).jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ina_mounds_at_low_Sun.png
https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2006/09nov_moonalive
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/2461/shadowy-mountains-on-the-moon/?category=moons_earths-moon
https://moon.nasa.gov/resources/48/the-moons-surface/
https://moon.nasa.gov/resources/13/apollo-11-seismic-experiment/
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moon_diagram.svg
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/video/earth-seen-from-the-moon-stock-footage/1159024834?phrase=moon%20and%20earth&adppopup=true
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/milky-way-royalty-free-image/1085287936?phrase=space&adppopup=true
The Moon may appear to be a dead, grey rock, whose geologic activity petered out billions of years ago. But not so fast! Recent studies suggest that parts of the surface could be much younger, and stuff beneath the surface could be a-rumbling even now!
Hosted by: Stefan Chin
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever: Matt Curls, Alisa Sherbow, Dr. Melvin Sanicas, Harrison Mills, Adam Brainard, Chris Peters, charles george, Piya Shedden, Alex Hackman, Christopher R, Boucher, Jeffrey Mckishen, Ash, Silas Emrys, Eric Jensen, Kevin Bealer, Jason A Saslow, Tom Mosner, Tomás Lagos González, Jacob, Christoph Schwanke, Sam Lutfi, Bryan Cloer
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
SciShow Tangents Podcast: https://scishow-tangents.simplecast.com/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishowFacebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
#SciShow #science #education #learning #complexly
----------
Sources:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11214-019-0622-x
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2002JE001985
https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2252
https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aba8949
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02744-8
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04100-2
https://www.science.org/content/article/long-live-moon
https://www.science.org/content/article/recent-volcanic-eruptions-moon
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2000/pdf/1919.pdf
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/968290
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JE005826
http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Nov06/MoonGas.html
https://www.brown.edu/news/2017-03-28/ina
https://www.esrf.fr/news/general/lunar-volcanism/index_html
https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1402
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063313002286
https://astronomycommunity.nature.com/posts/the-moon-s-last-gasp-dating-the-youngest-lunar-sample
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.3819.pdf
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1251117
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/lroc-20110712-age.html
https://academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/44/4/4.21/195239?searchresult=1
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/radiometric-age-dating.htm
https://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Feature/3207
https://www.brown.edu/news/2020-04-30/tectonics
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11214-020-00709-3
https://moon.nasa.gov/system/downloadable_items/82_backb.pdf
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/study-finds-new-wrinkles-on-earths-moon
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/ames/lunar-origins-simulations
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/maps.13119
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/06/200622095019.htm
Image Sources:
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/video/modern-moon-stock-footage/1047389688?phrase=moon&adppopup=true
https://moon.nasa.gov/resources/331/the-apollo-15-hammer-feather-drop/?category=videos
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/13796
https://images.nasa.gov/details-ARC-20221004-AAV3443-MoonOrigin-Social-NASAWeb-1080p
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clementine_albedo_simp750.jpg
https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/orion-s-moon-crater-close-up
https://moon.nasa.gov/resources/257/view-of-goclenius-and-other-craters/?category=images
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/13537
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/10930
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ilifg26TZrI
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/moon-in-outer-space-royalty-free-image/1395983416?phrase=moon&adppopup=true
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo_Crew_Big_Bertha.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chang%27e-5_soil_samples.png
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo_12_Conrad_with_moon_rocks.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ina_hrp219a.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ina_(LRO).jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ina_mounds_at_low_Sun.png
https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2006/09nov_moonalive
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/2461/shadowy-mountains-on-the-moon/?category=moons_earths-moon
https://moon.nasa.gov/resources/48/the-moons-surface/
https://moon.nasa.gov/resources/13/apollo-11-seismic-experiment/
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moon_diagram.svg
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/video/earth-seen-from-the-moon-stock-footage/1159024834?phrase=moon%20and%20earth&adppopup=true
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/milky-way-royalty-free-image/1085287936?phrase=space&adppopup=true
Thanks to 80,000 Hours for supporting this SciShow video! 80,000 Hours is a nonprofit that aims to help people have a positive impact with their career.
You can start planning a career that helps solve the most pressing problems in the world at 80000hours.org/scishow. [♪ INTRO] So, you may have heard lots of hullabaloo lately about humans going back to the Moon. And there are a bunch of reasons to head up there, again, from scratching humanity’s itch to explore the unknown, to more practical things like mining.
But from the surface of our dynamic and ever-changing planet, it might seem like those journeys will be a little bit boring. It’s easy to dismiss the Moon as a lifeless, frozen rock. Because we can’t currently go inside the Moon to check on how geologically active it is, we have to rely on clues from its surface to tell us what’s going on.
And some of those clues tell us that the Moon could very much be alive. Before we talk about the Moon’s reputation for being geologically dead, we need to talk about how it was born. We think the Moon formed about four and a half billion years ago, back when the young Earth hadn’t quite grown to its full size.
Our proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planet called Theia had a bit of an altercation. They smashed right into one another and most of their guts ended up merging together. But this galactic car crash also threw tons of material into space, which eventually coalesced to form our Moon. The baby Moon would have loomed large in Earth’s sky.
Their mutual gravitational tugging may have caused massive tides of lava to spill over the surface. The Moon would have glowed red hot, from the surface down into the core. And it's been slowly cooling down ever since.
But cooling isn’t the same as frozen. And if there are still some liquidy bits churning around beneath the surface, we might see signs on the surface as recently solidified lava. When we look at the Moon, we see a bunch of gray splotches called maria, which is Latin for seas.
They’re darker in color from the rest of the surface because they’re made of a different kind of rock, called basalt,. That’s a type of frozen lava, so planetary scientists are pretty sure maria are evidence that the Moon was once geologically active. But is it still? And if not, how long ago did that end? Well, it turns out, dating the Moon can be tricky. And scientists have two main strategies.
The first is simply looking at craters. If a smaller crater is on top of another, we know that that crater has to be younger. Otherwise, it would have been destroyed when the larger meteorite hit.
We can also look at the number of craters in an area. Generally the greater the crater count, the older a patch of rock is because space rocks have had more time to smash themselves into it. These are both forms of relative dating. Craters can’t tell us the absolute age of a particular part of the Moon.
But we can use them to tell how old a feature is compared to another one. Most of the Moon’s surface appears to be billions of years old. But by counting craters, scientists have identified lava that may be a mere 18 million years old! If the Moon were my age, that’s, like, less than two months ago.
But to confirm it’s actually that young, we’d need to get our hands on actual rock samples to get a precise age. And that’s where the second dating method comes in. We can cross reference crater counts with radiometric dating to get a baseline for age estimates. Radiometric dating looks at the composition of the rocks themselves.
Some isotopes, or versions of atoms, are radioactive and break down over time. And they do that breaking down at a very predictable rate. So to estimate how old a given moon rock is, scientists will compare two measurements: how much of the original isotope is left, versus how much there is of the stuff it decayed into.
Unfortunately, real lunar samples are a little bit hard to come by. You can’t exactly just pop up there whenever you like to date whatever part of the Moon you want. But the Apollo missions of the 1960s and 70s did bring back hundreds of kilos of rocks.
And in 2020, China’s Chang’E-5 lander performed its own sample return. The Apollo rock collection is chock full of samples that formed over four billion years ago. Meanwhile, Chang’E-5’s basalts were dated to be as young as two billion years old!
So just going by these limited samples, it looks like lunar volcanism went quiet a long time ago. Which actually could be good news for future explorers. After all, the Moon’s surface is dangerous enough without having to worry about new pools of lava erupting from the ground or a volcanic eruption ruining your day. But some features call this into question.
Take Ina for example. It’s a small but bright crater in a spot called the Lake of Happiness. Ina isn’t like other craters.
It wasn’t caused by an impact. If it were, we would expect to see its floor lower than the surrounding surface. Instead, it looks more like a volcanic feature, and its rock looks more shiny and less worn down than the surrounding material, making it appear super young.
Now, we’ve only photographed Ina from space. No mission has ever landed in it, so one team started counting its craters. And in 2006, they came back with the incredibly young estimate of two million years, if not younger!
To explain this age, they proposed what might seem like a pretty quirky hypothesis: The Moon let out a giant burp of subsurface lunar gas. When the gas escaped, the rock collapsed with the sudden lack of support. But it is worth noting that not every astronomer agrees Ina is this young.
There’s another gassy hypothesis out there that Ina’s rocks were made out of a super foamy lava, kinda like pumice. Their texture could be hiding a lot of craters, making Ina look literally billions of years younger than it really is. Either way, two million years is still a long time for us humans.
So Ina might not be enough evidence to say the Moon isn’t dead now, but we’re not done yet. Even if humans have never seen an eruption, we do know that underneath its surface, the Moon is rumbling. Lunar scientists have analyzed nearly a decade of moonquake recordings, thanks to seismometers left up there by Apollo astronauts. But what could be causing them?
There shouldn’t be much heat left over from the Moon’s formation, but radioactive elements deep underground could be releasing enough energy to power tectonic activity. And while the Moon doesn’t have giant plates of crust sliding around like Earth does, there might be enough of a difference in heat between rocks deeper underground and those near the surface to allow rocks to shift positions. As the rock slowly cools, it becomes denser and sinks, while warm, less dense rock pushes its way up. And the ongoing mutual gravitational tugging between the Earth and Moon, and even the occasional space rock impact, could add to the total heat budget, as well.
Collectively, maybe it’s warm enough for some liquid magma to be moving around down there. Upcoming missions may be able to learn more. While there probably won’t be any explosive Mt.
St Helen’s style eruptions for our explorers to witness, the Moon still has many secrets beneath its surface. We have only just begun to get a glimpse. And if you’re searching for a glimpse at a new job that really makes a difference in the world, you can start with 80,000 hours. 80,000 Hours is a nonprofit created to help you find a fulfilling job. They aim to help people have a positive impact with their career and really do some good in the world.
All of their curated high impact career postings are free to access through their job board. But whether you’re ready to look at job postings or not, you can always start with their blog posts and podcast that explore different global problems and careers that help solve them. Just like the Moon, the concept of a rewarding job search isn’t as dead as you think.
For a free copy of the 80,000 hours in-depth career guide, click the link in the description down below or go to 80000hours.org/scishow. While you’re there, you can sign up for their newsletter full of updates on their research and job opportunities. And just to be clear, everything they provide is always free; their only aim is to help you find a fulfilling, impactful career. Thanks for watching this SciShow video and thanks to 80,000 hours for supporting it! [♪ OUTRO]
You can start planning a career that helps solve the most pressing problems in the world at 80000hours.org/scishow. [♪ INTRO] So, you may have heard lots of hullabaloo lately about humans going back to the Moon. And there are a bunch of reasons to head up there, again, from scratching humanity’s itch to explore the unknown, to more practical things like mining.
But from the surface of our dynamic and ever-changing planet, it might seem like those journeys will be a little bit boring. It’s easy to dismiss the Moon as a lifeless, frozen rock. Because we can’t currently go inside the Moon to check on how geologically active it is, we have to rely on clues from its surface to tell us what’s going on.
And some of those clues tell us that the Moon could very much be alive. Before we talk about the Moon’s reputation for being geologically dead, we need to talk about how it was born. We think the Moon formed about four and a half billion years ago, back when the young Earth hadn’t quite grown to its full size.
Our proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planet called Theia had a bit of an altercation. They smashed right into one another and most of their guts ended up merging together. But this galactic car crash also threw tons of material into space, which eventually coalesced to form our Moon. The baby Moon would have loomed large in Earth’s sky.
Their mutual gravitational tugging may have caused massive tides of lava to spill over the surface. The Moon would have glowed red hot, from the surface down into the core. And it's been slowly cooling down ever since.
But cooling isn’t the same as frozen. And if there are still some liquidy bits churning around beneath the surface, we might see signs on the surface as recently solidified lava. When we look at the Moon, we see a bunch of gray splotches called maria, which is Latin for seas.
They’re darker in color from the rest of the surface because they’re made of a different kind of rock, called basalt,. That’s a type of frozen lava, so planetary scientists are pretty sure maria are evidence that the Moon was once geologically active. But is it still? And if not, how long ago did that end? Well, it turns out, dating the Moon can be tricky. And scientists have two main strategies.
The first is simply looking at craters. If a smaller crater is on top of another, we know that that crater has to be younger. Otherwise, it would have been destroyed when the larger meteorite hit.
We can also look at the number of craters in an area. Generally the greater the crater count, the older a patch of rock is because space rocks have had more time to smash themselves into it. These are both forms of relative dating. Craters can’t tell us the absolute age of a particular part of the Moon.
But we can use them to tell how old a feature is compared to another one. Most of the Moon’s surface appears to be billions of years old. But by counting craters, scientists have identified lava that may be a mere 18 million years old! If the Moon were my age, that’s, like, less than two months ago.
But to confirm it’s actually that young, we’d need to get our hands on actual rock samples to get a precise age. And that’s where the second dating method comes in. We can cross reference crater counts with radiometric dating to get a baseline for age estimates. Radiometric dating looks at the composition of the rocks themselves.
Some isotopes, or versions of atoms, are radioactive and break down over time. And they do that breaking down at a very predictable rate. So to estimate how old a given moon rock is, scientists will compare two measurements: how much of the original isotope is left, versus how much there is of the stuff it decayed into.
Unfortunately, real lunar samples are a little bit hard to come by. You can’t exactly just pop up there whenever you like to date whatever part of the Moon you want. But the Apollo missions of the 1960s and 70s did bring back hundreds of kilos of rocks.
And in 2020, China’s Chang’E-5 lander performed its own sample return. The Apollo rock collection is chock full of samples that formed over four billion years ago. Meanwhile, Chang’E-5’s basalts were dated to be as young as two billion years old!
So just going by these limited samples, it looks like lunar volcanism went quiet a long time ago. Which actually could be good news for future explorers. After all, the Moon’s surface is dangerous enough without having to worry about new pools of lava erupting from the ground or a volcanic eruption ruining your day. But some features call this into question.
Take Ina for example. It’s a small but bright crater in a spot called the Lake of Happiness. Ina isn’t like other craters.
It wasn’t caused by an impact. If it were, we would expect to see its floor lower than the surrounding surface. Instead, it looks more like a volcanic feature, and its rock looks more shiny and less worn down than the surrounding material, making it appear super young.
Now, we’ve only photographed Ina from space. No mission has ever landed in it, so one team started counting its craters. And in 2006, they came back with the incredibly young estimate of two million years, if not younger!
To explain this age, they proposed what might seem like a pretty quirky hypothesis: The Moon let out a giant burp of subsurface lunar gas. When the gas escaped, the rock collapsed with the sudden lack of support. But it is worth noting that not every astronomer agrees Ina is this young.
There’s another gassy hypothesis out there that Ina’s rocks were made out of a super foamy lava, kinda like pumice. Their texture could be hiding a lot of craters, making Ina look literally billions of years younger than it really is. Either way, two million years is still a long time for us humans.
So Ina might not be enough evidence to say the Moon isn’t dead now, but we’re not done yet. Even if humans have never seen an eruption, we do know that underneath its surface, the Moon is rumbling. Lunar scientists have analyzed nearly a decade of moonquake recordings, thanks to seismometers left up there by Apollo astronauts. But what could be causing them?
There shouldn’t be much heat left over from the Moon’s formation, but radioactive elements deep underground could be releasing enough energy to power tectonic activity. And while the Moon doesn’t have giant plates of crust sliding around like Earth does, there might be enough of a difference in heat between rocks deeper underground and those near the surface to allow rocks to shift positions. As the rock slowly cools, it becomes denser and sinks, while warm, less dense rock pushes its way up. And the ongoing mutual gravitational tugging between the Earth and Moon, and even the occasional space rock impact, could add to the total heat budget, as well.
Collectively, maybe it’s warm enough for some liquid magma to be moving around down there. Upcoming missions may be able to learn more. While there probably won’t be any explosive Mt.
St Helen’s style eruptions for our explorers to witness, the Moon still has many secrets beneath its surface. We have only just begun to get a glimpse. And if you’re searching for a glimpse at a new job that really makes a difference in the world, you can start with 80,000 hours. 80,000 Hours is a nonprofit created to help you find a fulfilling job. They aim to help people have a positive impact with their career and really do some good in the world.
All of their curated high impact career postings are free to access through their job board. But whether you’re ready to look at job postings or not, you can always start with their blog posts and podcast that explore different global problems and careers that help solve them. Just like the Moon, the concept of a rewarding job search isn’t as dead as you think.
For a free copy of the 80,000 hours in-depth career guide, click the link in the description down below or go to 80000hours.org/scishow. While you’re there, you can sign up for their newsletter full of updates on their research and job opportunities. And just to be clear, everything they provide is always free; their only aim is to help you find a fulfilling, impactful career. Thanks for watching this SciShow video and thanks to 80,000 hours for supporting it! [♪ OUTRO]