scishow space
We Used 1800s Math to Solve One of Jupiter’s Biggest Mysteries
YouTube: | https://youtube.com/watch?v=5m3NGmUfS4M |
Previous: | Space Superlatives of 2020! |
Next: | 3 Space Missions to Look for in 2021 |
Categories
Statistics
View count: | 133,466 |
Likes: | 7,912 |
Comments: | 297 |
Duration: | 05:54 |
Uploaded: | 2020-12-29 |
Last sync: | 2024-10-23 15:15 |
Citation
Citation formatting is not guaranteed to be accurate. | |
MLA Full: | "We Used 1800s Math to Solve One of Jupiter’s Biggest Mysteries." YouTube, uploaded by , 29 December 2020, www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m3NGmUfS4M. |
MLA Inline: | (, 2020) |
APA Full: | . (2020, December 29). We Used 1800s Math to Solve One of Jupiter’s Biggest Mysteries [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=5m3NGmUfS4M |
APA Inline: | (, 2020) |
Chicago Full: |
, "We Used 1800s Math to Solve One of Jupiter’s Biggest Mysteries.", December 29, 2020, YouTube, 05:54, https://youtube.com/watch?v=5m3NGmUfS4M. |
Jupiter's storms cover the planet, but the ones at the planet’s poles have mystified astronomers for years: why haven’t they merged together yet?
Hosted by: Hank Green
SciShow has a spinoff podcast! It's called SciShow Tangents. Check it out at http://www.scishowtangents.org
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever:
Marwan Hassoun, Jb Taishoff, Bd_Tmprd, Harrison Mills, Jeffrey Mckishen, James Knight, Christoph Schwanke, Jacob, Matt Curls, Sam Buck, Christopher R Boucher, Eric Jensen, Lehel Kovacs, Adam Brainard, Greg, Ash, Sam Lutfi, Piya Shedden, KatieMarie Magnone, Scott Satovsky Jr, charles george, Alex Hackman, Chris Peters, Kevin Bealer
----------
Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: http://dftba.com/scishow
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
----------
Sources:
http://www.nasonline.org/publications/biographical-memoirs/memoir-pdfs/mayer-alfred.pdf
https://www.nature.com/articles/018013b0.pdf
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-09/ciot-sts092320.php
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-09/potn-soj090220.php
https://www.pnas.org/content/117/39/24082
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00033797600200141
Images:
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12878
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12880
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA21641
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/30907
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hurricanes/videos/index.html
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA23444
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/738/jupiters-southern-exposure-in-infrared/?category=planets_jupiter
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/736/cyclones-encircle-jupiters-north-pole/?category=planets_jupiter
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/cassini/science/saturn/hexagon-in-motion/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PIA18274-Saturn-NorthPolarHexagon-Cassini-20140402.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PSM_V10_D140_Alfred_Marshall_Mayer.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Londonedinburg-114-115.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lord_Kelvin_photograph.jpg
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA21970
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA21984
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA22931
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/3520
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA23605
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA21972
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA21975
Hosted by: Hank Green
SciShow has a spinoff podcast! It's called SciShow Tangents. Check it out at http://www.scishowtangents.org
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever:
Marwan Hassoun, Jb Taishoff, Bd_Tmprd, Harrison Mills, Jeffrey Mckishen, James Knight, Christoph Schwanke, Jacob, Matt Curls, Sam Buck, Christopher R Boucher, Eric Jensen, Lehel Kovacs, Adam Brainard, Greg, Ash, Sam Lutfi, Piya Shedden, KatieMarie Magnone, Scott Satovsky Jr, charles george, Alex Hackman, Chris Peters, Kevin Bealer
----------
Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: http://dftba.com/scishow
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
----------
Sources:
http://www.nasonline.org/publications/biographical-memoirs/memoir-pdfs/mayer-alfred.pdf
https://www.nature.com/articles/018013b0.pdf
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-09/ciot-sts092320.php
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-09/potn-soj090220.php
https://www.pnas.org/content/117/39/24082
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00033797600200141
Images:
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12878
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12880
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA21641
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/30907
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hurricanes/videos/index.html
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA23444
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/738/jupiters-southern-exposure-in-infrared/?category=planets_jupiter
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/736/cyclones-encircle-jupiters-north-pole/?category=planets_jupiter
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/cassini/science/saturn/hexagon-in-motion/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PIA18274-Saturn-NorthPolarHexagon-Cassini-20140402.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PSM_V10_D140_Alfred_Marshall_Mayer.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Londonedinburg-114-115.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lord_Kelvin_photograph.jpg
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA21970
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA21984
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA22931
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/3520
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA23605
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA21972
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA21975
[♪ INTRO].
The Great Red Spot is one of Jupiter’s most striking features. Scientists first observed the storm back in 1664 and have regularly tracked it since the mid-1800s.
At its largest measured size, it could fit three Earths inside of it. But Jupiter is also home to an arguably more intriguing population of storms encircling each of its poles. We first learned about them in the mid-2010s, but to explain their existence, scientists had to go back to math from the 1800s, which described a completely unrelated phenomenon: floating magnets.
Cyclones on Jupiter are basically the suped-up siblings of the ones on Earth. They follow similar trajectories, forming near the equator and diverging toward a pole. It’s just that, on Earth, the storms never actually make it to the poles:.
They run aground and lose energy. And the colder ocean waters also provide less fuel as they go. Meanwhile, gas giants like Jupiter have no surface to sap their energy, and their poles aren’t that much colder than their equators.
So these storms make it all the way up to the proverbial ends of the planet. In 2016, the Juno spacecraft observed a set of six cyclones at the south pole, and nine in the north, ranging from four to seven thousand kilometers across. There’s one storm about in the center, and the rest orbit around it at roughly equal distances to one another.
And the systems have basically been stable since then. But in theory, the storms should have merged into one large storm at each pole, something reminiscent of the hexagonal cyclone on Saturn. Why they hadn’t was a huge mystery.
So one team hunted for an explanation. And for some unclear reason, they traveled back to the 1870s, and an experiment with magnets. Way back in 1878, American physicist and professor Alfred Mayer published what was basically a classroom demonstration.
It was about how molecules will naturally arrange themselves into certain shapes. In the demonstration, he magnetized needles and stuck each one in a cork floating on some water, with all the magnets’ south poles pointing up. Then, he hung another magnet above the setup with its north pole pointing down.
That way, the needles would be attracted toward a central point, but they couldn’t get too close because their matching south poles would repel one another. This forced the magnets into different geometric arrangements depending on the number of needles. Really, it was just a big lesson in “like repels like” and “opposites attract”; the stuff about magnets you learned in elementary school, just applied to molecules.
And if you’re looking for the connection, it had nothing to do with Jupiter. That part comes next. Not long after Mayer published his demo, the British physicist William Thomson, eventually dubbed Lord Kelvin, published some of the math behind it.
He showed how the needles will force themselves into a certain state of equilibrium, balancing mutual repulsion against their common attraction. And the number of needles changed what those points of equilibrium were. Thompson published his findings not long afterward.
And he also noted that Mayer’s demo was a great analogy for column-shaped vortices orbiting a mutual center of gravity. Now that might sound completely unrelated to molecules to you, but at the time, Thompson hypothesized that atoms weren’t particles, but vortices within a frictionless fluid called ether that permeated space. This is not true, but his math was legit.
His proof showed that point-like vortices could be spaced out symmetrically along the circumference of a circle, remaining stable for up to six vortices. But once you tried to add a seventh, it became unstable. And future work would show that adding a sufficiently strong vortex in the middle could stabilize the system for as many vortices as you cared to fit around it.
And this is of course where Jupiter finally comes back in. This 2020 team realized that huh, maybe the storms on Jupiter could be described with this old magnet math. They just had to convert magnetic attraction and repulsion into something else.
And they did! The attraction became a cyclone’s tendency to migrate toward the poles, which basically happens because of a net wind that forms inside the storms, pushing them either north or south. As for the magnetic repulsion, that became a special type of “shielding” on Jupiter, a ring of wind surrounding each storm that rotates in the opposite direction.
And shockingly, this worked! The math applied to Jupiter, too! Using computer modeling, the team used these equations to figure out how strong that shielding effect needed to be to keep the storms in the stable positions Juno was observing.
The number itself isn’t very important, because it depends on the specific parameters of Jupiter’s atmosphere and the storms themselves. Instead, the real point is that the math is once again, legit! Equations from a century and a half ago can finally describe the layout of Jupiter’s polar storms and why they haven’t merged together yet.
That said, there are, of course, still plenty of mysteries remaining. Like, we don’t know how or where the cyclones first formed. We don’t know why the number of storms has been so stable.
And we don’t know how this shielding managed to form around Jupiter’s vortices, but not over on Saturn. So there’s almost just as many questions as there were before. But eventually, knowing how the superstorms on other planets work will help scientists better understand the quirks of weather here on Earth.
And really, this serves as a reminder that sometimes, you don’t need fancy new math or computers to solve new problems. Sometimes, it’s just a matter of looking for the right clues in the history books. Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow Space!
If that aspect of Jupiter’s weirdness wasn’t enough for you, you might want to check out another one of our Jupiter episodes, about how this giant planet is a total jerk, but also our friend. [♪ OUTRO].
The Great Red Spot is one of Jupiter’s most striking features. Scientists first observed the storm back in 1664 and have regularly tracked it since the mid-1800s.
At its largest measured size, it could fit three Earths inside of it. But Jupiter is also home to an arguably more intriguing population of storms encircling each of its poles. We first learned about them in the mid-2010s, but to explain their existence, scientists had to go back to math from the 1800s, which described a completely unrelated phenomenon: floating magnets.
Cyclones on Jupiter are basically the suped-up siblings of the ones on Earth. They follow similar trajectories, forming near the equator and diverging toward a pole. It’s just that, on Earth, the storms never actually make it to the poles:.
They run aground and lose energy. And the colder ocean waters also provide less fuel as they go. Meanwhile, gas giants like Jupiter have no surface to sap their energy, and their poles aren’t that much colder than their equators.
So these storms make it all the way up to the proverbial ends of the planet. In 2016, the Juno spacecraft observed a set of six cyclones at the south pole, and nine in the north, ranging from four to seven thousand kilometers across. There’s one storm about in the center, and the rest orbit around it at roughly equal distances to one another.
And the systems have basically been stable since then. But in theory, the storms should have merged into one large storm at each pole, something reminiscent of the hexagonal cyclone on Saturn. Why they hadn’t was a huge mystery.
So one team hunted for an explanation. And for some unclear reason, they traveled back to the 1870s, and an experiment with magnets. Way back in 1878, American physicist and professor Alfred Mayer published what was basically a classroom demonstration.
It was about how molecules will naturally arrange themselves into certain shapes. In the demonstration, he magnetized needles and stuck each one in a cork floating on some water, with all the magnets’ south poles pointing up. Then, he hung another magnet above the setup with its north pole pointing down.
That way, the needles would be attracted toward a central point, but they couldn’t get too close because their matching south poles would repel one another. This forced the magnets into different geometric arrangements depending on the number of needles. Really, it was just a big lesson in “like repels like” and “opposites attract”; the stuff about magnets you learned in elementary school, just applied to molecules.
And if you’re looking for the connection, it had nothing to do with Jupiter. That part comes next. Not long after Mayer published his demo, the British physicist William Thomson, eventually dubbed Lord Kelvin, published some of the math behind it.
He showed how the needles will force themselves into a certain state of equilibrium, balancing mutual repulsion against their common attraction. And the number of needles changed what those points of equilibrium were. Thompson published his findings not long afterward.
And he also noted that Mayer’s demo was a great analogy for column-shaped vortices orbiting a mutual center of gravity. Now that might sound completely unrelated to molecules to you, but at the time, Thompson hypothesized that atoms weren’t particles, but vortices within a frictionless fluid called ether that permeated space. This is not true, but his math was legit.
His proof showed that point-like vortices could be spaced out symmetrically along the circumference of a circle, remaining stable for up to six vortices. But once you tried to add a seventh, it became unstable. And future work would show that adding a sufficiently strong vortex in the middle could stabilize the system for as many vortices as you cared to fit around it.
And this is of course where Jupiter finally comes back in. This 2020 team realized that huh, maybe the storms on Jupiter could be described with this old magnet math. They just had to convert magnetic attraction and repulsion into something else.
And they did! The attraction became a cyclone’s tendency to migrate toward the poles, which basically happens because of a net wind that forms inside the storms, pushing them either north or south. As for the magnetic repulsion, that became a special type of “shielding” on Jupiter, a ring of wind surrounding each storm that rotates in the opposite direction.
And shockingly, this worked! The math applied to Jupiter, too! Using computer modeling, the team used these equations to figure out how strong that shielding effect needed to be to keep the storms in the stable positions Juno was observing.
The number itself isn’t very important, because it depends on the specific parameters of Jupiter’s atmosphere and the storms themselves. Instead, the real point is that the math is once again, legit! Equations from a century and a half ago can finally describe the layout of Jupiter’s polar storms and why they haven’t merged together yet.
That said, there are, of course, still plenty of mysteries remaining. Like, we don’t know how or where the cyclones first formed. We don’t know why the number of storms has been so stable.
And we don’t know how this shielding managed to form around Jupiter’s vortices, but not over on Saturn. So there’s almost just as many questions as there were before. But eventually, knowing how the superstorms on other planets work will help scientists better understand the quirks of weather here on Earth.
And really, this serves as a reminder that sometimes, you don’t need fancy new math or computers to solve new problems. Sometimes, it’s just a matter of looking for the right clues in the history books. Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow Space!
If that aspect of Jupiter’s weirdness wasn’t enough for you, you might want to check out another one of our Jupiter episodes, about how this giant planet is a total jerk, but also our friend. [♪ OUTRO].