YouTube: https://youtube.com/watch?v=suEm3uFJA2s
Previous: The Place Where You Can Touch Two Continents
Next: When Did Humans ACTUALLY Get to the Americas?

Categories

Statistics

View count:227,783
Likes:9,677
Comments:1,013
Duration:08:25
Uploaded:2025-05-14
Last sync:2026-08-11 19:00

Citation

Citation formatting is not guaranteed to be accurate.
MLA Full: "What’s The Fastest Language?" YouTube, uploaded by SciShow, 14 May 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=suEm3uFJA2s.
MLA Inline: (SciShow, 2025)
APA Full: SciShow. (2025, May 14). What’s The Fastest Language? [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=suEm3uFJA2s
APA Inline: (SciShow, 2025)
Chicago Full: SciShow, "What’s The Fastest Language?", May 14, 2025, YouTube, 08:25,
https://youtube.com/watch?v=suEm3uFJA2s.
Visit https://brilliant.org/scishow/ to get started learning STEM for free and get 20% off their annual premium subscription.













Correction:






8:14 This episode has some mistakes in our on-screen credits. The Writer is Tom Rivlin, the script Script Editor is JD Voyek, and the Fact Checker is Angela Reed.













Have you ever listened to someone speaking a foreign language and thought "Wow they're speaking way faster than I do"? Well it's not all in your head because you don't understand what they're saying (It's also not because you just speak slower than average). Some languages really do tend to be spoken more quickly than others. And there might be a biological reason for it.













Hosted by: Stefan Chin






----------






Support us for $8/month on Patreon and keep SciShow going!






https://www.patreon.com/scishow






Or support us directly: https://complexly.com/support






Join our SciShow email list to get the latest news and highlights:






https://mailchi.mp/scishow/email






----------






Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever: J.V. Rosenbalm, Bethany Matthews, Toyas Dhake, David Johnston, Lyndsay Brown, Alan Wong, Jeffrey Mckishen, Kaitlyn O'Callaghan, Reed Spilmann, Garrett Galloway, Friso, kickinwasabi, Gizmo, Jeremy Mattern, Blood Doctor Kelly, Eric Jensen, Jaap Westera, Matt Curls, Jp Lynch, Wesus, Chris Curry, Cye Stoner, Kevin Knupp, Piya Shedden, Adam Brainard, Alex Hackman, Jason A Saslow, Kevin Bealer, Joseph Ruf, Chris Peters, Chris Mackey, Steve Gums






----------






Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?






SciShow Tangents Podcast: https://scishow-tangents.simplecast.com/






TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@scishow






Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow






Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow






Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/scishow.bsky.social













#SciShow #science #education #learning #complexly






----------






Sources: https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vS06GsnxKWGaqXLe6NB78u_i36GvaxLP1bZIQIB7ZVx-P6WyaKymLUx4QSS-2pE4lsthrsLFQmm58m-/pub
The other day I was watching a  telenovella, and it got me wondering.

What is the fastest spoken language in the world? Well according to a study published in 2019, there are at least two different  answers to that question, depending on what you actually care about. [♪INTRO] Okay let’s get this out of  the way right at the top.

Obviously, individual people have  different normal speaking rates. I mean, have you met Hank? I don’t speak as fast as that  guy on my most caffeinated days.

And then there’s the fact  that different accents within the same language are spoken at different rates. Yeah, there’s actually research that shows that, on average, a US Southern accent  is slower than northern ones. So to find the fastest spoken language, you’ve gotta recruit a bunch of people for at least as many languages  as you can account for.

In the study we’re talking about here, the researchers targeted 17 languages. Which is tiny compared to  the total number of languages that exist in the world, but together  they cover over 3 billion humans, and nine different language families. They even included Basque, which isn’t related to any  other language on the planet!

Then, they recruited native  speakers of each language, had them read out translated  versions of the same set of messages, and kept track of both how long it took them, and how many syllables they spoke. Here is one of those example messages: “Last night I opened the  front door to let the cat out. It was such a beautiful evening that I wandered down the garden for a breath of fresh air.

Then I heard a click as the door closed behind me. I realised I'd locked myself out. To cap it all, I was arrested while  I was trying to force the door open!” So, how’d I score?

Well… I don’t know if that’s good or bad. Okay now let’s cut to SciShow’s own Hiroka Matsushima, who’ll read the same message, but in Japanese: 昨夜、猫を外に出してやろうと玄関を開けたら、 とても気持のいい夜だった。新鮮な空 気を吸おうと、 僕も庭へ出てみると、 背後でドアの閉まるカチッと言う音が聞こえ、 締め出 されてしまった。挙句の果てに、 ドアをこじ開けようとしているところを逮捕されてしまっ た。 Now this was just a demo of the experiment, and not of the results. Because again, we’re just  two individuals providing one point of data for each language.

But by doing this over and  over, with 170 different people, the team concluded that, on average, Spanish really is spoken faster than English: Spanish clocked in 8 syllables per second, compared to English’s 6 syllables per second.. In fact, Spanish had the  study’s second-highest speed, beaten only by Japanese. But here’s the thing: the goal of the study wasn’t actually to work out which  language is spoken the fastest.

Instead, it was to find out which language has the highest information rate. And to find that, the researchers needed to work out how information dense each language is. In other words, how much information  does each syllable convey?

Again, on average. Take the Spanish word ‘nerviosa’. It means the same thing as “nervous”,  but has twice as many syllables.

So the ‘information per syllable’ in  ‘nerviosa’ is half that of ‘nervous’. But Spanish can also say the same thing as English using fewer syllables. Instead of, “You’re going too  far”, you can just say “Te pasas!” So to rigorously compare the information density of all their languages, the research team turned to an old idea from the founder of the information age, Claude Shannon.

In the 1940s, he invented what’s  now called the Shannon entropy, which measures the capacity  something has to surprise you. Back in the 50s, he even tried  to measure the value for English! And these days, it’s used  all over science and math.

Like, a dice roll has more  possible outcomes than a coin toss, so dice roll results are more  surprising than coin tosses, and a dice roll’s Shannon  entropy is a larger number. The researchers behind our  2019 paper calculated both a language’s Shannon entropy,  plus a slightly modified version called the ‘second-order’ Shannon entropy. And to get a value for that,  you have to calculate how easy it is to guess the  next syllable in a language.

And as a side note: if this sounds  familiar, it might be because it’s related to how Large Language Models work. Once the team did a bunch of math  using this fun-looking equation, they were able to produce an  information density for each language. But again, they were looking at spoken languages, and speaking a language requires saying a bunch of syllables over time, so they also did some math to get the information rate.

And yes, you can think of it as a bit rate like when you’re trying to transfer data on a computer. When we look at Spanish versus English, we find that both rates are roughly the same. Around 43 bits per second.

So on average, Spanish needs more syllables to convey the same information that English does. But since Spanish also gets syllables out quicker, ideas are conveyed in the same amount of time. But to find out which language’s  bit rate came out on top, first, you have to make it through this ad.

Thanks to Brilliant for  supporting this SciShow video! Brilliant is an online  learning platform that helps you build knowledge through interactive lessons. But with Brilliant you don’t have to sit down in a lecture hall at a specific time to learn.

Instead, you can learn anywhere that your phone is which is usually anywhere that you are. So, if you’re picking up your  kid from soccer practice, waiting for your friend to meet you for brunch, or whenever you have spare minutes, you can dive into a new topic  or do a quick practice session. To try Brilliant for free,  visit brilliant.org/scishow or scan the QR code onscreen— or you can click on the link in the description.

You’ll also get 20% off an  annual premium subscription. There are, of course, still some  caveats to this study’s findings. For one thing, the translations  the participants read could never be 100% identical in terms of  what information was conveyed.

Like, French words for  professions always convey gender, and Japanese honorifics denote  relations in a way English just can’t. That context often gets lost in translation. So you can never say exactly  how much information a syllable contains in one language, compared  to its direct translation in another.

But despite the limitations,  the team found a pattern across the 17 languages they investigated: faster-spoken languages tend to carry less  information per syllable. That averaged out to the  information rate across each language being roughly the  same: 39 bits per second. If you are desperate to crown a winner, French had the highest average information rate, at around 45 bits per second.

Meanwhile, languages like  German, Hungarian, and Thai would come in near the bottom  of the proverbial leaderboard. But really, the headline  coming out of this research is that no matter what language  you speak, it seems you convey information at approximately the same rate. Which kinda hints that  something deeper is going on.

The researchers speculated that it has something to do with how brains process information. There’s probably a limit to  how fast brains can consider information in spoken words, which means you can’t speak quickly when the  information content is too dense. But speaking too slowly, or having too  little information in each syllable, isn’t good either, because then a listener would have to store too much information in working memory for too long  while you finish your point.

This hypothesis seems to be backed by a new study published in the journal Neuron. Its authors looked beyond mere speaking, comparing bit rates calculated  for a range of activities, from reading, to typing, to playing video games. They noted that our brains  process information during these various activities at a rate  between five and 50 bits per second.

Which is only a rough  estimate, but the main takeaway was how narrow the range turned out to be. They also speculated that  this rate could be deeply hard-wired into how our  neurons function, constraining everything we do, including  speaking and listening. Whatever the answer, scientists  are still working on it.

That 2019 paper left a lot of  major languages out, after all. And over the years, other papers have both supported and challenged its results. So if you’re a French speaker,  you might want to hold off before you purchase that “Fastest  Conveyer of Information” trophy. [♪OUTRO]