| YouTube: | https://youtube.com/watch?v=W7DdTBii6V0 |
| Previous: | Why Is Getting Healthcare So Much Work? |
| Next: | (None) |
Categories
Statistics
| View count: | 93 |
| Likes: | 13 |
| Comments: | 0 |
| Duration: | 04:33 |
| Uploaded: | 2026-08-31 |
| Last sync: | 2026-08-31 19:30 |
For years, the conversation around kids and screen time has sounded something like this: screens are bad, full stop. Less is better, more is worse, and as a parent you should feel really bad about the time your kid spends with a screen, and using the tablet as a babysitter could ruin your kids’ lives.
But is that the full story? We’re about to find out.
Related HCT episodes:
Violence and Video Games? https://youtu.be/m2Jq7vPxYGg
Are Video Games GOOd for kids? https://youtu.be/RJwKChIRTOs
Be sure to check out our podcast!
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkfBg8ML-gInFaYyYhKLBp2u7h5IojTw4
Other Healthcare Triage Links:
1. Support the channel on Patreon: http://vid.io/xqXr
2. Check out our Facebook page: http://goo.gl/LnOq5z
3. We still have merchandise available at http://www.hctmerch.com
4. Aaron's book "The Bad Food Bible: How and Why to Eat Sinfully" is available wherever books are sold, such as Amazon: http://amzn.to/2hGvhKw
Credits:
Aaron Carroll -- Writer
Tiffany Doherty -- Writer and Script Editor
John Green -- Executive Producer
Stan Muller -- Director, Producer
Mark Olsen – Art Director, Producer
But is that the full story? We’re about to find out.
Related HCT episodes:
Violence and Video Games? https://youtu.be/m2Jq7vPxYGg
Are Video Games GOOd for kids? https://youtu.be/RJwKChIRTOs
Be sure to check out our podcast!
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkfBg8ML-gInFaYyYhKLBp2u7h5IojTw4
Other Healthcare Triage Links:
1. Support the channel on Patreon: http://vid.io/xqXr
2. Check out our Facebook page: http://goo.gl/LnOq5z
3. We still have merchandise available at http://www.hctmerch.com
4. Aaron's book "The Bad Food Bible: How and Why to Eat Sinfully" is available wherever books are sold, such as Amazon: http://amzn.to/2hGvhKw
Credits:
Aaron Carroll -- Writer
Tiffany Doherty -- Writer and Script Editor
John Green -- Executive Producer
Stan Muller -- Director, Producer
Mark Olsen – Art Director, Producer
For years, the conversation around kids and screen time has sounded something like this.
Screens are bad. Full stop.
Less is better, more is worse. And as a parent, you should feel really bad about the time your kid spends with the screen. And maybe even that using the tablet as a babysitter could ruin your kids lives. but is that the full story?
We're about to find out? Because Screen Time is the topic of this week's Healthcare Triage. First, the negative reputation of screen time didn't come out of nowhere.
Some of the strongest early data we have comes from the ABCD study or the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, which is one of the largest long term studies of brain development and child health in the United States. researchers have used the data set to look at how screen time relates to things like sleep, mental health, and cognitive outcomes. across multiple analyses, higher levels of screen use have been associated with things like shorter sleep duration, more behavioral problems, and differences in attention and impulse control. Some studies have also linked heavier screen use to increased symptoms of anxiety and depression, But it's more complicated than that. First, not all screen time is the same.
Watching passive video content, playing interactive games and video chatting with friends are all lumped into screen time, but they're fundamentally different experiences. Second, a lot of these studies are correlational. That means they can show relationships, but they can't prove cause and effect.
So when we see the kids who use screens more also have more behavioral issues, we have to ask if screen time is causing those outcomes or if something else is at play. For all we know, kids who are already struggling might just be more likely to turn to screens. Importantly, recent research has challenged the idea that screen time is universally harmful.
A 2025 study out of the University of South Florida looks specifically a kid's smartphone use, and found that surprise under certain conditions, smartphone use was associated with positive outcomes. In this study, part of the Life in Media Survey, researchers found that kids who use smartphones in more socially connected ways like messaging friends or engaging in interactive communication show benefits and areas like social connection and well-being. The key factor wasn't just how much time kids spent on their phones, it was how they were using them.
That's an important shift in perspective, because it suggests that screen time isn't just a quantity problem, but a quality problem, too Another recent analysis presented similarly nuanced results. Instead of a simple more screens equals worse outcomes relationship. The data showed that moderate screen use wasn't necessarily harmful.
Again, context mattered. Kids using screens for learning, creativity, or social interaction had very different experiences than kids engaging in more passive or isolating forms of use. Importantly, access to technology and how it's used can vary dramatically depending on a child's environment.
For some kids, screens are primarily entertainment. For others, there are critical tool for education, communication, and access to resources. Research tells us that in lower resource settings, digital media can help bridge gaps by providing access to information, learning tools, and social networks that might otherwise be limited.
At the same time, differences in supervision, digital literacy, and content quality can also shape outcomes in very different ways. Conversations about screen time would be more productive if the issue were approached as a whole ecosystem. Instead of boiling it down to something like minutes per day on a device, we likely need to broaden the conversation to include what kids are doing, why they're doing it, who they're doing it with, and what alternatives they have.
There's still good evidence that excessive, especially passive, screen use, can be associated with negative outcomes, particularly when it replaces sleep, physical activity or in-person interaction. But the narrative is changing around screens being inherently good or bad. I mean, you're getting your Healthcare Triage from a screen, so how can it be all bad?
Screens are increasingly being viewed instead as tools, and like any tool, their impact depends on how they're used. Hey, did you enjoy this video? You might enjoy this oldie but goodie on violence and video games.
We'd appreciate it if you'd like this video, subscribe to the channel down below. Perhaps go on over to Patreon.com/HealthcareTriage where you can help support the show. Make it bigger and better.
We'd especially like to thank our research associates Edward Liljeholm and Christopher Learn and of course, our Surgeon Admiral Sam.
Screens are bad. Full stop.
Less is better, more is worse. And as a parent, you should feel really bad about the time your kid spends with the screen. And maybe even that using the tablet as a babysitter could ruin your kids lives. but is that the full story?
We're about to find out? Because Screen Time is the topic of this week's Healthcare Triage. First, the negative reputation of screen time didn't come out of nowhere.
Some of the strongest early data we have comes from the ABCD study or the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, which is one of the largest long term studies of brain development and child health in the United States. researchers have used the data set to look at how screen time relates to things like sleep, mental health, and cognitive outcomes. across multiple analyses, higher levels of screen use have been associated with things like shorter sleep duration, more behavioral problems, and differences in attention and impulse control. Some studies have also linked heavier screen use to increased symptoms of anxiety and depression, But it's more complicated than that. First, not all screen time is the same.
Watching passive video content, playing interactive games and video chatting with friends are all lumped into screen time, but they're fundamentally different experiences. Second, a lot of these studies are correlational. That means they can show relationships, but they can't prove cause and effect.
So when we see the kids who use screens more also have more behavioral issues, we have to ask if screen time is causing those outcomes or if something else is at play. For all we know, kids who are already struggling might just be more likely to turn to screens. Importantly, recent research has challenged the idea that screen time is universally harmful.
A 2025 study out of the University of South Florida looks specifically a kid's smartphone use, and found that surprise under certain conditions, smartphone use was associated with positive outcomes. In this study, part of the Life in Media Survey, researchers found that kids who use smartphones in more socially connected ways like messaging friends or engaging in interactive communication show benefits and areas like social connection and well-being. The key factor wasn't just how much time kids spent on their phones, it was how they were using them.
That's an important shift in perspective, because it suggests that screen time isn't just a quantity problem, but a quality problem, too Another recent analysis presented similarly nuanced results. Instead of a simple more screens equals worse outcomes relationship. The data showed that moderate screen use wasn't necessarily harmful.
Again, context mattered. Kids using screens for learning, creativity, or social interaction had very different experiences than kids engaging in more passive or isolating forms of use. Importantly, access to technology and how it's used can vary dramatically depending on a child's environment.
For some kids, screens are primarily entertainment. For others, there are critical tool for education, communication, and access to resources. Research tells us that in lower resource settings, digital media can help bridge gaps by providing access to information, learning tools, and social networks that might otherwise be limited.
At the same time, differences in supervision, digital literacy, and content quality can also shape outcomes in very different ways. Conversations about screen time would be more productive if the issue were approached as a whole ecosystem. Instead of boiling it down to something like minutes per day on a device, we likely need to broaden the conversation to include what kids are doing, why they're doing it, who they're doing it with, and what alternatives they have.
There's still good evidence that excessive, especially passive, screen use, can be associated with negative outcomes, particularly when it replaces sleep, physical activity or in-person interaction. But the narrative is changing around screens being inherently good or bad. I mean, you're getting your Healthcare Triage from a screen, so how can it be all bad?
Screens are increasingly being viewed instead as tools, and like any tool, their impact depends on how they're used. Hey, did you enjoy this video? You might enjoy this oldie but goodie on violence and video games.
We'd appreciate it if you'd like this video, subscribe to the channel down below. Perhaps go on over to Patreon.com/HealthcareTriage where you can help support the show. Make it bigger and better.
We'd especially like to thank our research associates Edward Liljeholm and Christopher Learn and of course, our Surgeon Admiral Sam.



