scishow space
The "Impossible" Propulsion System
YouTube: | https://youtube.com/watch?v=1k8ipMXAKOE |
Previous: | The Apollo Program's Loneliest Astronauts |
Next: | 3 Planets That Shouldn't Exist |
Categories
Statistics
View count: | 413,370 |
Likes: | 12,057 |
Comments: | 1,638 |
Duration: | 04:41 |
Uploaded: | 2016-11-25 |
Last sync: | 2024-10-19 16:00 |
Citation
Citation formatting is not guaranteed to be accurate. | |
MLA Full: | "The 'Impossible' Propulsion System." YouTube, uploaded by , 25 November 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k8ipMXAKOE. |
MLA Inline: | (, 2016) |
APA Full: | . (2016, November 25). The "Impossible" Propulsion System [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=1k8ipMXAKOE |
APA Inline: | (, 2016) |
Chicago Full: |
, "The 'Impossible' Propulsion System.", November 25, 2016, YouTube, 04:41, https://youtube.com/watch?v=1k8ipMXAKOE. |
Do you remember the exciting rumor about NASA’s EMdrive? Well, now it’s official: NASA has created their own EM drive! Meanwhile, SpaceX has a plan which will make the internet more accessible.
Hosted by: Caitlin Hofmeister
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters -- we couldn't make SciShow without them! Shout out to Bryce Daifuku, Kevin Bealer, Justin Lentz, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Patrick Merrithew, Accalia Elementia, Fatima Iqbal, Benny, Kyle Anderson, Mike Frayn, Tim Curwick, Will and Sonja Marple, Philippe von Bergen, Chris Peters, Kathy Philip, Patrick D. Ashmore, Thomas J., Charles George, Bader AlGhamdi.
----------
Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: http://dftba.com/scishow
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
----------
Sources:
http://www.sciencealert.com/it-s-official-nasa-s-peer-reviewed-em-drive-paper-has-finally-been-published
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.B36120
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160517-pilot-wave-theory-gains-experimental-support/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a22678/em-drive-cannae-cubesat-reactionless/
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/11/spacex-plans-worldwide-satellite-internet-with-low-latency-gigabit-speed/
http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/osoindex/search-ng.jspx?lf_id=
http://www.hughesnetinternet.net/gen4/
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/question606.htm
Images:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EmDrive_built_by_Eagleworks_inside_the_test_chamber.jpg
http://sec353ext.jpl.nasa.gov/ep/multimedia.html
http://sec353ext.jpl.nasa.gov/ep/img/hall_thrusters/6kw_321.jpg
Hosted by: Caitlin Hofmeister
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow
----------
Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters -- we couldn't make SciShow without them! Shout out to Bryce Daifuku, Kevin Bealer, Justin Lentz, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Patrick Merrithew, Accalia Elementia, Fatima Iqbal, Benny, Kyle Anderson, Mike Frayn, Tim Curwick, Will and Sonja Marple, Philippe von Bergen, Chris Peters, Kathy Philip, Patrick D. Ashmore, Thomas J., Charles George, Bader AlGhamdi.
----------
Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: http://dftba.com/scishow
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow
----------
Sources:
http://www.sciencealert.com/it-s-official-nasa-s-peer-reviewed-em-drive-paper-has-finally-been-published
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.B36120
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160517-pilot-wave-theory-gains-experimental-support/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a22678/em-drive-cannae-cubesat-reactionless/
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/11/spacex-plans-worldwide-satellite-internet-with-low-latency-gigabit-speed/
http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/osoindex/search-ng.jspx?lf_id=
http://www.hughesnetinternet.net/gen4/
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/question606.htm
Images:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EmDrive_built_by_Eagleworks_inside_the_test_chamber.jpg
http://sec353ext.jpl.nasa.gov/ep/multimedia.html
http://sec353ext.jpl.nasa.gov/ep/img/hall_thrusters/6kw_321.jpg
[SciShow intro plays]
Caitlin: There’s been a lot of talk about starships over the last week or so. You know: exploring strange new worlds, seeking out new life, and all that. And all thanks to a new engine that’s stumping scientists. Back in 2015, Hank took a trip into the SciShow Space Debunker, where we explored the rumor that NASA had created an EM drive, or an electromagnetic drive. It’s a propulsion system that doesn’t need any propellant, and in theory, the technology could get you to Mars in only 70 days.   Problem is, it also seems to violate the laws of physics.
Back then, other labs had created EM drives and reported that they generated a tiny amount of thrust, but nothing had been peer-reviewed, and there was no official report that NASA had made their own EM drive. But a year and a half later, it’s official: NASA has actually created an EM drive. And it seems to work.
The peer-reviewed paper, which was published last week in the AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, comes from researchers at Eagleworks, a lab at NASA’s Johnson Space Center. Instead of the usual rocket fuel, the EM drive works by bouncing microwaves back and forth in a cone-shaped chamber. The waves start in the narrow end of the cone, and eventually generate thrust toward the wider end to move the spacecraft.
Which is really cool! Except, according to Isaac Newton, it should also be impossible. Newton’s Third Law of Motion says that every action has an equal and opposite reaction -- so when the microwaves hit the chamber, the chamber should push back, and the spacecraft shouldn’t go anywhere. Right now, no one is actually sure why the EM drive works, but the researchers think it could have something to do with the pilot-wave theory of quantum mechanics.
According to the traditional, mainstream model of quantum mechanics, particles don’t have a definite location until you observe them. But according to pilot-wave theory, particles always have a definite location. It might sound simple, but it has a lot of weird implications -- like that vacuums, which are supposed to be empty, must be filled with some kind of quantum field.
There isn’t much support for the theory, but if it is true, it would mean the microwaves in the EM drive could sort of bounce against the vacuum. The force between the waves and the chamber wouldn’t cancel out, so Newton’s Third Law wouldn’t be violated. If that sounds vague and complicated — well, it is.
Even the NASA researchers aren’t sure how it really works, and pilot-wave theory is just one idea. They have done tests to make sure nothing is interfering with the drive, though -- like running it in a vacuum to make sure air molecules weren’t getting in the way. So, no one really knows what’s going on, but it looks like the technology is legit.
It still has a long way to go before it could possibly be useful, though. Right now, the drive produces about 1.2 milliNewtons per kilowatt of thrust. Compare that to the Hall thruster, which accelerates ions to move spacecraft through deep space and is a serious contender for Mars missions. It generates about 60 milliNewtons per kilowatt. So even though the EM drive is lighter and might be easier to manage, we’ll need a much more efficient version before we can use it to zoom around the galaxy.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk continues to make us all wonder if there’s anything SpaceX can’t do. In September, the company announced big plans to colonize Mars -- but while they’re working on that, they’ll also be trying to deliver satellite internet to the entire world. Last week, SpaceX filed an application with the United States Federal Communications Commission to launch 4,425 satellites into Earth’s orbit for a global internet service.
And if you think that seems like a lot of satellites, you are right. Right now, there are only around 7,500 satellites in orbit, meaning SpaceX hopes to increase that number by 50% all by themselves. This puts SpaceX on a growing list of companies, like Facebook and OneWeb, that are trying to bring the internet to everyone on Earth -- including the billions of people who don’t have access to the internet right now.
With traditional internet, the signal travels along wires from your phone or cable provider to your modem. Satellite internet, on the other hand, sends the signals between a dish on your roof, a satellite in orbit, and a larger dish at a ground station. Satellite internet doesn’t require any cable or phone networks, so it’s great for rural communities, but it also takes a while for the signals to bounce back and forth.
Other companies are already providing satellite internet to some of the world, but SpaceX’s network will be faster and more accessible. For one thing, their satellites will have much lower orbits -- around 1,100 to 1,325 kilometers, which will cut lag times down to 25 to 35 milliseconds since the signals don’t have to travel as far. For comparison, the company HughesNet has satellites orbiting around 35,400 kilometers up with lag times of 600 milliseconds or more.
The planned SpaceX network will be at least 17 times faster. SpaceX also promises download speeds up to 1 gigabit per second, which is 100 times faster than other networks, which offer around 10 megabits per second. If their application is approved, SpaceX will still have to build the satellites and ground stations, but satellites could potentially start launching as soon as 2019. Which means that pretty soon, a lot more people could have access to the internet — all thanks to a little rocket science.
Thank you for watching this episode of SciShow Space News, and special thanks to our patrons on Patreon! If you’d like to help us keep making episodes just like this, you can go to Patreon.com/SciShow, and don’t forget to go to YouTube.com/scishowspace and subscribe!
Caitlin: There’s been a lot of talk about starships over the last week or so. You know: exploring strange new worlds, seeking out new life, and all that. And all thanks to a new engine that’s stumping scientists. Back in 2015, Hank took a trip into the SciShow Space Debunker, where we explored the rumor that NASA had created an EM drive, or an electromagnetic drive. It’s a propulsion system that doesn’t need any propellant, and in theory, the technology could get you to Mars in only 70 days.   Problem is, it also seems to violate the laws of physics.
Back then, other labs had created EM drives and reported that they generated a tiny amount of thrust, but nothing had been peer-reviewed, and there was no official report that NASA had made their own EM drive. But a year and a half later, it’s official: NASA has actually created an EM drive. And it seems to work.
The peer-reviewed paper, which was published last week in the AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, comes from researchers at Eagleworks, a lab at NASA’s Johnson Space Center. Instead of the usual rocket fuel, the EM drive works by bouncing microwaves back and forth in a cone-shaped chamber. The waves start in the narrow end of the cone, and eventually generate thrust toward the wider end to move the spacecraft.
Which is really cool! Except, according to Isaac Newton, it should also be impossible. Newton’s Third Law of Motion says that every action has an equal and opposite reaction -- so when the microwaves hit the chamber, the chamber should push back, and the spacecraft shouldn’t go anywhere. Right now, no one is actually sure why the EM drive works, but the researchers think it could have something to do with the pilot-wave theory of quantum mechanics.
According to the traditional, mainstream model of quantum mechanics, particles don’t have a definite location until you observe them. But according to pilot-wave theory, particles always have a definite location. It might sound simple, but it has a lot of weird implications -- like that vacuums, which are supposed to be empty, must be filled with some kind of quantum field.
There isn’t much support for the theory, but if it is true, it would mean the microwaves in the EM drive could sort of bounce against the vacuum. The force between the waves and the chamber wouldn’t cancel out, so Newton’s Third Law wouldn’t be violated. If that sounds vague and complicated — well, it is.
Even the NASA researchers aren’t sure how it really works, and pilot-wave theory is just one idea. They have done tests to make sure nothing is interfering with the drive, though -- like running it in a vacuum to make sure air molecules weren’t getting in the way. So, no one really knows what’s going on, but it looks like the technology is legit.
It still has a long way to go before it could possibly be useful, though. Right now, the drive produces about 1.2 milliNewtons per kilowatt of thrust. Compare that to the Hall thruster, which accelerates ions to move spacecraft through deep space and is a serious contender for Mars missions. It generates about 60 milliNewtons per kilowatt. So even though the EM drive is lighter and might be easier to manage, we’ll need a much more efficient version before we can use it to zoom around the galaxy.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk continues to make us all wonder if there’s anything SpaceX can’t do. In September, the company announced big plans to colonize Mars -- but while they’re working on that, they’ll also be trying to deliver satellite internet to the entire world. Last week, SpaceX filed an application with the United States Federal Communications Commission to launch 4,425 satellites into Earth’s orbit for a global internet service.
And if you think that seems like a lot of satellites, you are right. Right now, there are only around 7,500 satellites in orbit, meaning SpaceX hopes to increase that number by 50% all by themselves. This puts SpaceX on a growing list of companies, like Facebook and OneWeb, that are trying to bring the internet to everyone on Earth -- including the billions of people who don’t have access to the internet right now.
With traditional internet, the signal travels along wires from your phone or cable provider to your modem. Satellite internet, on the other hand, sends the signals between a dish on your roof, a satellite in orbit, and a larger dish at a ground station. Satellite internet doesn’t require any cable or phone networks, so it’s great for rural communities, but it also takes a while for the signals to bounce back and forth.
Other companies are already providing satellite internet to some of the world, but SpaceX’s network will be faster and more accessible. For one thing, their satellites will have much lower orbits -- around 1,100 to 1,325 kilometers, which will cut lag times down to 25 to 35 milliseconds since the signals don’t have to travel as far. For comparison, the company HughesNet has satellites orbiting around 35,400 kilometers up with lag times of 600 milliseconds or more.
The planned SpaceX network will be at least 17 times faster. SpaceX also promises download speeds up to 1 gigabit per second, which is 100 times faster than other networks, which offer around 10 megabits per second. If their application is approved, SpaceX will still have to build the satellites and ground stations, but satellites could potentially start launching as soon as 2019. Which means that pretty soon, a lot more people could have access to the internet — all thanks to a little rocket science.
Thank you for watching this episode of SciShow Space News, and special thanks to our patrons on Patreon! If you’d like to help us keep making episodes just like this, you can go to Patreon.com/SciShow, and don’t forget to go to YouTube.com/scishowspace and subscribe!